Amy: Ending Notes

Cinematography:

  • ELS of the crowd at the concert – drone (digital)
  • official and amateur footage used from the concert
  • positioned with the crowd but align with Amy
  • found footage of her body being carried out – desaturated (Michael Moore)
  • LS of someone crying at the funeral

 

Mise en Scene:

  • blurry/grainy found footage of the concert – audience position, matches the documentary’s style of actuality
  • red light – demonic, slow-mo (V/O ‘it felt like the end’
  • ‘she totally blow it’ – TV footage (Michael Moore)
  • sub-titled dialogue of the crowd e.g. ‘sing’
  • CU picture of her bare feet (paparazzi) – cropped
  • professional photo – smiling – V/O about drinking
  • ‘3 weeks later’
  • ‘4:05 pm’
  • desaturation
  • friend picture
  • subtitles
  • magazine cover – ‘demons’
  • Funeral footage – disrespectful of the documentary of commentary of paparazzi

 

Perfromance:

  • Amy hugs the band
  • Amy sits down on stage
  • There is a person reassuring Amy’s dad at the funeral

 

Editing:

  • slow-mo of Amy on stage when she is not singing
  • photo of Amy taken out of focus. ‘she didn’t want to do it’ at airport
  • After funeral – montage of Amy – smiling, singing, ordinary
  • cross fade to Amy on street and her phone (CU) – took stud out, modest clothes, white clothes, edited picture, healthier?, picture purposefully chosen, Ken burns but very slight, less judgmental
  • montage during credits while famous song plays
  • slow-mo – police etc

 

Sound:

  • dropped in airplane sound
  • sound bridge of crowd cheering
  • non-diegetic paparazzi camera sounds over paparazzi pictures – effect
  • crowed cheer and then boo – mood shift
  • V/O – ‘she just wouldn’t sing’
  • diegetic band on stage – won’t sing
  • V/O – excited about the wedding, didn’t care that she had messed up
  • V/O – ex-manager and friend) ‘she said she hadn’t been drinking’
  • ringing sound effect
  • friend Juliette – ‘ It was my Amy’ ‘she just kept saying sorry’ V/O – compared to a child, almost crying, ‘missed my best friend’ – cross fades to picture of them as children
  • ‘If I could give it back just to walk down that street… i would’ – someone repeating what she had said V/O – contrasts to earlier in the film (‘lucky’)
  • non-diegetic piano during phone call that started the film

 

Moore:

  • guided in terms of representation of Amy and what to feel (e.g. wants to make you cry)

 

Digital Debate:

  • drone – exaggerates that she has been taken away from her home to the airport
  • phones

 

Amy – Recording Session – Notes

Cinematography:

  • functional lighting (archive footage)
  • crash zooms e.g. of buttons, Amy singing
  • rooming camera
  • amateur footage – authenticity, amateurs

 

Mise En Scene:

  • lyrics on screen
  • archive footage
  • non-glamourous

 

Performances

  • enjoying the music
  • Amy seems happier without Blake, negative portrayal of Blake
  • Amy – professional
  • ‘All my strength comes from my nan’

 

Editing:

  • fake lens flare when she is singing
  • slow-mo of Nan (w/ music, dame as when Amy’s dead body is carried out)
  • animated lyrics

 

Sound:

  • diegetic singing in the middle of non-diegetic music/singing, then diegetic again
  • V/O ‘tempestuous’ – theme. ‘relationship’ – Mark
  • V/O about nan paired with a visual
  • V/O against Amy being a procrastinator despite what the media says
  • nan is sick

 

Moore:

  • guiding how you feel about Amy e.g. V/O, lens flare, archive footage specifically chosen

Amy – Park Scene Notes

  • bittersweet: park, sunnyAmy’s happy, V/O, paparazzi, Kn Burns

 

Cinematography:

  • static image
  • long lens (Paparazzi) – being spied on. They’re not friends taking a picture, strangers, exploiting a celebrity
  • high key lighting
  • didn’t know the pictures were being taken (contrasting to the homeless person pictures)
  • paparazzi vs phone (homeless) – people may have already seen these images

 

Mise en Scene:

  • edited interview?
  • Ken Burns – a long shot of Amy – lingers for a long time, forcing us to look at and possibly judge what she is wearing, judgmental, paired with V/O, or is it reminiscent of and criticising how the paparazzi treated her

 

Sound:

  • non-diegetic music – being guided
  • V/O childhood – dad leaving her mum, the man’s childhood possibly edited together with sex V/O
  • V/O with a long shot of her body discussing her promiscuous behavior
  • V/O – self-destructive people
  • V/O – in love with Blake – paired with images of love hearts next to Blake’s name that she has drawn
  • comparison to Blake earlier – not dramatized, monotone, detached – V/O about how they liked to self-sabotage over ken Burns body – not eating enough?

 

Moore:

  • guided viewing experience
  • Moore wouldn’t judge Amy, he would criticize the media but possibly using similar technical codes

 

Digital Debate:

  • drone footage

Amy- Middle Notes

Cinematography:

  • photos
  • found footage
  • EXL of Camden – digital – couldn’t of been film (heavy)

 

Mise en Scene:

  • CU of Amy’s dirty shoes and a homeless person’s shoes
  • Photograph subtly introduces Blake then we meet him

 

Performance:

  • introduced to more people

 

Editing:

  • slowing down drone footage
  • very slow Ken Burns effect
  • slow-mo on Blake – gross, highlighting his mindset
  • may have lightened her in the photo – others are desaturated
  • Ken Burns and zoom – Amy doing a gesture with V/O of a guying saying he slept with her

Sound:

  • strings – drunk, needed to come home in a wheel burrow confession
  • sound bridge of microphone noise
  • V/O life is short
  • non-diegetic piano
  • interview over the phone – need subtitles the audio’s so bad
  • ‘drunk’
  • ‘things started changing’ image of smiling with friends (Ken Burns)
  • V/O of Pete – ‘best looking’, ‘coolest’
  • Voice over doesn’t always match with what we see

 

Digital Debate:

  • mobile
  • drone
  • gathering of footage you wouldn’t have without digital technology

 

Amy: Opening Notes

Cinematography:

  • Not filmed for professional use – handheld, lightings not right, actuality, phone
  • still images/photographs
  • found footage
  • crash zoom – Amy performing on stage
  • singing on stage – low light grain, auto focus

 

Mise en scene:

  • found footage
  • singing on stage
  • lyrics on-screen – cursive font
  • first person we see is Juliette, Amy’s mate
  • ‘1998, Southgate, London’
  • Car footage – tells us the date (2001) and sets up Tyler and Nick – development
  • The mise-e-scene has been picked specifically. Builds story. How Amy is now and what she’s doing changes as the film goes on.

 

Performance:

  • carefree and happy
  • Amy singing on someone’s 14th birthday, she is impersonating Marlyn Monroe singing to the president
  • Amy laying on her friends
  • Amy holding and talking to the camera/herself
  • first singing – Amy, child, a parody of Monroe who died young, regular person, one of the people in the room

 

Editing:

  • – edited lens flare – photo of Amy, zoomed in on (moves, colorful)
  • montage of her Jazz influences with Voice Over – learned from everything, Jazz Monk – undermining expectations?
  • slowed down footage
  • text is put on screen along with the lyrics
  • Ken Burns effect (e.g. the picture of the written down lyrics)
  • crossfade – poems with v/o to picture
  • lack of continuity – Amy goes from the stairs to the mirror – singing
  • disconnected visual and audio footage
  • animated text
  • highlighting lyrics because she wrote them? cursive font

 

Sound:

  • opening – non-diegetic music over found footage – piano, single note motif
  • Amy voice over discussing her love for Jazz – Amy singing constructs the narrative
  • Voice over is played over found footage e.g. talking about singing cut over footage – slow motion at some points, smile, v/o ‘lucky’ ‘just something I can do’, contrasts the end
  • ‘Moon River’ is sung by Amy in the opening credits (Breakfast at Tiffany’s) – laid back and dreamy but has issues — sound bridge, National Youth Jazz Orchestra

 

Kim Longinotto:

  • The director doesn’t interact with the subject

 

Michael Moore:

  • An attempt to sway audience opinions of Amy, had to because of media perception?

 

Critical Debate – Digital Technology:

  • edited lens flare – romantic, glamour, happy

La La Land: Revision Notes

Ideology:

An ideological analysis of the feminism ideology has been important in developing and understanding the theme of independence in La La Land. For example, during the messengers sequence, Emma Stone’s performance highlights her strong reaction to the situation. When she hears the Messenger’s music, it’s clear that she understands that Seb is performing music he doesn’t like and is living a dream that isn’t his. This is evident on her face which we see through mid-shots focused on her, and the use of change in coloured lighting from orange to blue suggests a lack of passion once she hears the song representing how Seb has a lack of passion for this band which an active spectator would pick up on whereas a passive spectator would just pick up on his performance of playing with one hand in his pocket. Mia feels strongly about this, and quickly tells Sebastian that she believes he’s not where he wants to be or should be. This reaction shows that she doesn’t spectate passively, which goes against the feminist critique that Mia is portrayed as a spectator and she only spectates passively. This is also proven wrong earlier in the film when she picks up on the jazz music in the restaurant and has a strong reaction to it and therefore leaves. Her having her own opinion and strong reaction to art and Seb’s performances shows that she is independent, therefore linking onto the theme of independence, and by doing this the film explores feminism in a way that proves the feminist critique wrong as Mia is a self-reliant and independent woman. The theme of independence is started during the opening, when the woman is singing about leaving her old life and close ones behind to achieve her dreams which is reflective of Mia later on in the film. However, this does link into the representation of LA because the woman in singing a song in major key in a yellow dress (which has happy connotations) yet they’re in a traffic jam which could be a visual metaphor for how it’s actually hard to make it in LA. Moreover, Mia is represented to spectators as an independent and passionate performer, such as during the audition scene. The spotlight motif that is reminiscent of Seb’s spotlight is used to focus in on her, conveying to active viewers that she is lost in her art and passionate, therefore emphasising her independence as a performer and as a woman as well as he ability to perform brilliantly just like Seb.

Another ideology that is explored is traditionalism which links in with the binary opposition of traditionalism and progression. This binary opposition and theme are largely explored through Mia and Sebastian; she represents the future and he the past. For example, when we first meet them, Sebastian is rewinding tapes to old music and Mia is learning new lines. An passive or active viewer would consider how this is why during the messengers scene it’s made so clear that Sebastian is not where he should be. The spotlight that shines on him at the start is reminiscent of the spotlight from the restaurant, but after all the music kicks in it disappears and ‘in you face’ bright lights flood the screen. This reflects how Sebastian is no longer lost in his art because this isn’t the art he wants to perform, before he was sticking to traditional music and now, he’s performing modern music. Passive viewers are aligned with Mia because she isn’t happy with it either, and there’s more film form elements that tell the spectator to be unhappy with it too like the ridiculous dancers or the painful to listen to diegetic synth. This links to the ideology of traditionalism because the messenegers music is all about progression which contrasts against Seb’s tradionalists beliefs. Some people have pegged this moment with a feminist critique saying that Mia is always the spectator and Seb the performer. In many ways this can be proved wrong, but one way is to link it to the ideology of traditionalism and the binary opposition of traditionalism and progression. If Mia represents progression, it’s normal for future art to take influence from the traditional art, whereas, traditional art is less likely/never going to do so. Therefore, it’s not about gender, but rather the binary opposition of progression and traditionalism, which therefore links into the ideology of traditionalism.

 

Passive and Active Spectatorship:

The opening of ‘La La Land’ can been viewed on a passive level to seem absurdly happy with the upbeat diegetic music, the bright colours, and synchronised dancing. However, an active spectator would see beyond this appearance, and find the true meaning of the scene. The somewhat perfect aspects of the scene contrast the harsh reality of making it in Hollywood, therefore being a representation of LA and what it’s really like. For example, the scene is edited to appear as though it’s taken in one shot, which would seem perfect and dreamlike. However, the cuts are actually hidden in whip pans suggesting that everything is not as perfect as it all seems on the surface. Plus, as they all sing on the runway, the traffic jam can be interpreted by an active spectator to be a visual metaphor for what it’s like trying to make it in LA, it’s difficult and there’s not enough space for everyone. Moreover, the diegetic song may sound upbeat and happy, but the lyrics all suggest a more negative side to the situation including what they’ve given up on to try and make it. Meanwhile, there is a synchronised dance number (an element of the musical genre) again suggesting perfection which contrasts to the reality which they express in their song. In terms of responses, I think the preferred reading of this scene is to understand the true nature of making it in LA, and to consider the upbeat music, perfect looking cinematography and the use of bight primary colours as somewhat ironic. However, the primary colours do also give to the scene in other ways because of their connotations. For example, the use of red showing passion like the woman’s dress.

However, the opening scene of ‘La La Land’ also has passive spectatorship in terms of the film exploring the old and new, specifically old and new film. The opening shot is in black and white which is reminiscent of classical Hollywood, it then becomes colourful being suggestive of the modern film industry. There’s also an accidental Marilyn Monroe reference, which they decided to keep in because of said reference, where a woman’s dress blows up like Marilyn Monroe’s did in the film ‘The Seven Year Itch’, which is one of the most iconic bits of cinema ever and so using this moment was a perfect way for the film to continue exploring the binary opposition of the old and new, as well as traditionalism and progress. An active spectatorship may be required to explore the ideas presented regarding these binary oppositions and consider how the film is exploring the conflict and compromise in creating new art in terms of the old and the new. For example, the Cinemascape writing cannot be fully seen until the twin wipe and in the process it becomes more colourful, this editing and mise en scene is suggestive of the old new being co-existent, but also how there’s conflict as they can’t both exists at the same time without compromise. However, the theme of individuality suggests the importance of individuality in creating art and it not just being about traditionalism and/or progress. The different genres of diegetic music, and the performances of different dancing shows this individuality between them, and how it’s important, as well as being a good representation of LA.

The preferred response to the Messengers scene is to understand how although Sebastian is playing for a big and appreciative crowd, it’s not his dream. A passive spectatorship can see this in Mia’s performance, and as a spectator would align with her. Her shocked face paired with the harsh blue lighting with connotations of coldness rather than the original yellow lighting, all suggest that she is empathetic but also disappointed that Sebastian is dedicating so much time to a career that isn’t his passion. Sebastian’s performance can also be interpreted by a passive spectator that he isn’t where her wants to be or should be. Whereas in the restaurant he played passionately now he plays with one hand in his pocket. It makes sense to refer to the restaurant scene, as the opening of the Messengers performance has Sebastian under spotlight which is reminiscent of the moment on the restaurant where it identified how engrossed he was in his art. Now, the screen is flooded with bright and colourful in your face lights, a visual representation that this isn’t his dream, and he notices how Mia is lost in the crowd. Passive spectators can also pick up on this due to the commercial and over the top performance such as the ridiculous dancers, the very colourful and bright lights, and the synth. The synths diegetic noise is painful to listen to, again suggesting that this isn’t a good place to be especially for Sebastian.

However, the Messenger’s scene requires an active watch from the spectator as well in terms of the representation of women. The film has been criticised for Mia being displayed as the spectator and Sebastian as the performer. A passive spectator may feel this way, but an active viewer would feel differently and get the preferred reading rather than the oppositional. Not only does Mia perform plenty, but she never passively spectates art. She notices the jazz music in the restaurant which requires attentiveness and knowledge, and in this scene her emotions are clear. Mia doesn’t clap along like the rest of the crowd she is independent and has her own opinion which she is quick to tell Sebastian without hesitation. Plus, when Sebastian doesn’t keep the relationship equally balanced by coming to her play, she ends the relationship. Furthermore, Mia represents progress and the new in the binary opposition of the old and new (traditionalism and progress), as she creates new art like her one woman show and Sebastian represents the traditionalism/old, he rewinds his tapes and wants to stick with classic jazz. This could be why Mia is seen watching him more than he’s seen spectating her because progress tends to be inspired by the old while keeping individual, whereas the old is just individual, this is an active viewing of the scene and probably the preferred reading or maybe a compromised reading of the scene/binary oppositions that run through the film.

 

 

Beasts of the Southern Wild: Revision

Examine how either sound or editing is used in one sequence from your chosen film. [10]

The montage in the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ shows all of the best bits of the Bathtub to the audience. For example, we get to see the community aspect to the bathtub which aligns us with them. This is through the mise en scene and performance of the people of the bathtub parading down the street together, while positive folk music plays both diegetically and non-diegetically adding to the positive community feel; this is also an example of the audience being positioned with the bathtub. However, this is also an example of different responses, as while some audience members might be focused on the community aspect, others might view their actions of drinking around children irresponsible, especially since this alcohol effects their actions such as making babies race. The slow cut rate during the montage allows the spectator to develop views and opinions like these responses as they are given time to consider what they are seeing. Some viewers might be active viewers during this scene in the montage, as they may consider the benefits and downsides to the way the adults act around their children. Another part of the montage editing that can be interpreted as showing the good side to the bathtub is the part at the beginning when Hushpuppy is eating. During ‘feed up time’, she is at one with the animals as she eats with them and shares the food with them. This links to how the teacher woman said, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. This brings the binary oppositions of animal and humans together as equals, rather than opposing them. Another example of this is when we are positioned with Hushpuppy through subject positioning of the heart beat when she holds the bird to her ear and we hear it too, this performance shows that she is caring, which is a reason why we are aligned with her as an audience but also shows that she is caring towards animals.

 

Explore how far spectators respond both actively and passively to film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film. [20]

The exposition of the movie is likely to be watched by a passive viewer, as it’s normal for the opening of movies to give the spectator lots of information, like ideologies and the characters values, that the spectator just needs to take in as a way of setting up the film. For example, the opening montage allows the spectator to see how the people of the bathtub value animals as equals, as Hushpuppy eats with them and shares her food with them. This is reinforced with the teacher woman saying, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. However, as the montage continues, a spectator is likely to be driven to be active, as they might question the positive and negative sides of the way that the Bathtub act around children. For example, a spectator might respond by seeing the adults behaviour as irresponsible, as the performance of the drinking around children encourages imitation from the children, and the alcohol influences their decisions and makes them do things like race babies. A different response may be that they agree that this is irresponsible, but also see the freedom and community aspect of the Bathtub. The mise en scene of everyone together, and the positive, diegetic and non-diegetic folk music provides this sense of community.

During the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ there is a scene where Wink and Hushpuppy are looking at the Levee. During this scene, the spectators are passive viewers as they are directly told Wink’s values on the ideology of environmentalism. An example of this, is when he calls the factories and the buildings ‘ugly’. This is part of the binary opposition of the bathtub and the Levee, as the bathtub has a lower carbon footprint than the Levee which is a reason why we are aligned with them. This opposition is emphasised with the mise en scene, as the Levee is at a distance and unsaturated, contrasting to the Bathtub which is colourful, and literally walled off, adding to the opposition. This opposition makes the spectator an active viewer, as they are inclined to compare the two ways of living, and possibly compare it to their own life too. The positioning with Wink then changes back to Hushpuppy when she comes into focus. Her voice over also provides ideas of environmentalism that she believes in, such as her confusion about how the Levee put their fish in ‘plastic wrappers’. However, a spectator might be active and consider to what level these ideas are hers, and to what extent she has been influenced by her father. Despite this, we are aligned with the bathtub as we know that being an environmentalist is a good thing.

Towards the end of the movie, when Wink is dying, the editing and sound encourages an active viewer rather than a passive viewer. The action reaction shots of Wink dying, and Hushpuppy have a slow cutting rate which means the spectator has the time to decide what they feel, consider the characters values of ‘no crying’, and decide who they are positioned with in this scene. The sound also allows the spectator to be active, as the lack of music means that the viewer is not guided or told what to feel, they decide and feel it for themselves. The active viewing continues after Wink’s death, during the funeral. When Hushpuppy is setting Wink’s body on fire, an active spectator might consider whether they believe it was right for Hushpuppy to be the one to do this, or irresponsible. A viewer might believe that it was right for Hushpuppy to do this, as exposing children to the dark side of life is inevitable and in some cases it’s not fair to shelter them. Plus, an active viewers interpretation of the symbol of the aurochs might be that they symbolise her fears or maybe even innocence, and so the performance of Hushpuppy turning round and facing them, and the long shot of them bending down to her, showed an active viewer that Huhpuppy was strong, able to stand up to her fears, and more mature than a child who needs to be sheltered from everything. Therefore, an active viewer might believe that it was right for Huspuppy to be the fire starter, as she has shown that she is capable, and her just watching, would have been going back on the way that Hushpuppy is presented to us.

 

 

 

Explore how far spectators respond in the same way to a film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film.  [20]

The opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ attracts different responses from spectators. At the very beginning, as it’s an exposition, most spectators are passive as the audience are told and shown directly characters ideologies and values. For example, how the people of the bathtub view themselves as equal to animals shown by the beyond close sonic perspective, subject positioning of the heart beat sound when Hushpuppy listens to the birds heart beat showing she cares for animals (making spectators aligned with her), and how during the ‘feed up time’ sequence in the montage, Hushpuppy eats with the animals and shares her food with them, this directly shows spectators that Hushpuppy values animals as equal to human, and the binary opposition of animal and human are brought together instead of opposed. As this is a passive sequence, most spectators would feel the same response, which is probably a respect for the way that Hushpuppy is caring for animals especially the bird because of her performance. However, as the montage sequence continues, spectators might start to respond in different ways. For example, according to Hall’s theory, the preferred response when the community are together drinking on the street is probably that the Bathtub is a positive place, where community is important, which is a response that some spectators would have. A reason why, is the performance of everyone being together emphasising the community feel, and the positive feel that the non-diegetic and diegetic folk music has on the scene. However, an oppositional reading and response (Hall), could be that the adults act irresponsibly, especially considering they are around children. They might believe that the performance of them drinking alcohol, encourages the children to do the same; children can be drinking, but most spectators assume it’s water. Plus, the drinking influences the adult’s actions, such as making them race babies, Therefore, a spectator’s response could instead be that the bathtub has irresponsible rules or lack thereof, rather than a good and free place. However, the most common response is probably the negotiated reading (Hall), where spectators combine these two attitudes about the bathtub.

 

The motif and symbol of the aurochs encourage a range of readings and responses from the audiences. Ad there true meaning is never explained explicitly, all active viewers would end up creating and attaching their own meaning to this symbol, therefore creating different responses between each individual. One response of the aurochs is that they symbolise Hushpuppy’s childhood and/or fears. This is because throughout the film, they keep appearing and re-appearing until the end when she stands up against them. The performance of her standing up against them, and the long shot of the aurochs kneeling down to her, shows that she has conquered the fears and/or difficulties that they represent, or maybe her childhood and innocence, as she says ‘I’ve got to take care of my own’, suggesting she is growing up. This line also adds to the theme of self-reliance, that the people of the bathtub have shown to have as a value throughout the movie. The response that the aurochs are a symbol for her childhood is reinforced with the music box non-diegetic music that plays one note at a time when Hushpuppy turns around and faces them, as the song has connotations of innocence and childhood.  However, another response that active viewers might have of the aurochs is that they represent the environmental problems, which adds to the ideology and theme of environmentalism that is explored throughout. This is because the aurochs came from the melting ice, and so they could be a symbol for the environmental problems that the world, but especially the bathtub have to face as they have to deal with floods. Hushpuppy standing strong against them, shows that she is able to deal and cope with the environmental problems, despite being a child, as the representation of children in this film is that they are strong and don’t need to be sheltered. This is an example of being aligned with Hushpuppy, as she is shown as brave as well as varying which is shown earlier in the film, such as how she cares for animals.

 

Another scene that encourages different responses from spectators is the catfish sequence; as there are many possible responses to this sequence, the viewer is active, as it’s difficult for someone to passively take in information during this scene, as nothing is explicitly said to the spectator. A possible response is that the reason that the cat fish building seems so lovely and warm, such as the mise en scene and cinematography of the brightly coloured fairy lights, is because we see everything from Hushpuppy’s perspective, we are positioned with her, and she is looking for something good and pure which is reflected by what she see’s and therefore what we see. The low-level camera work reinforces this positioning with Hushpuppy, and how we see the world from her perspective. This is why the camera focuses on the performance of the hugs, because Hushpuppy is looking for motherly love and so that’s what the spectator see’s too. However, this might not be interpreted by all spectators. Instead, a viewer might be focusing on the women like Hushpuppy’s mother and creating responses to her specifically. The preferred response is probably how Hushpuppy is imagining this woman is her mother, and she is looking for a mother figure. However, an oppositional reading and response is that Hushpuppy imagined her mother being there, and that the woman she interacted with wasn’t even there at all. The cinematography of the bright light when they walk into the kitchen could suggest a dream, and all the references to the mother like the alligator and the beer and the repeated camera angle of her back could be to show the spectator that Hushpuppy is imaging her mother is there. The shot of the air, as stuff floats from the pan, could suggest that the woman isn’t actually there as she cannot be seen, just like earlier in the film when Hushpuppy pretends to be talking to her mother but instead when the camera turns to the chair, she cannot be seen. Plus, after the woman leaves, Hushpuppy is in the same position as she was before, these proxemics could suggest to some spectators that she never moved at all, and instead imagined the whole thing.

House of Flying Daggers: Revision Notes

Opening:

CINEMATOGRAPHY: 

  • Mid-shot/long-shot of her standing in-front of Jin, then after a reaction, a close-up of Mei
  • She’s framed in the centre, giving her more of a presence than the other girls
  • high key lighting, low contrast
  • Crane shot – tug of war
  • Zoomed in to wide – tracking shot of women entering. Also happens later with Mei
  • central framing

 

MISE EN SCENE:

  • text to set up the plot and the historical context
  • Green and red outfits
  • Peony Pavilion: colourful, stylised, elaborate
  • Colourful outfits (Peony Pavilion)
  • Blue dress – blue can be seen as a military colour BUT it’s more to do with feelings than a symbolic meaning
  • Specially made flooring
  • During the opening titles – red art on a white background – foreshadowing the ending with the blood on the snow
  • military/police base has dull colours/lack of colour especially when compared to the Peony Pavillion
  • Saturated colours
  • Bits of blue on the carpet – butterflies – and Mei’s dress is blue (high angle shot)
  • Red lipstick and paint separates her from the other women (and she said she was unlike them) and a possible link to the red associated with the soldiers/police

 

EDITING:

  • Long take of her dancing (then it starts cutting – still her dancing)
  • Slow motion of her robe falling down after Jin cuts it
  • Cross fade of red lines to…….
  • Action reaction shots – conversation

 

PERFORMANCE:

  • Mei is walking cautiously – deceiving us that she is blind
  • Jin is drunk
  • Leo is polishing his sword and sitting upright, contrasting to Jin who is slouched and drinking (but they are of equal rank)
  • Picking up swords compared to the women and instruments (similar/same shot) – representation of men and women
  • Repetition of men picking up the swords and the repetition of the women carrying the instruments.
  • Although everyone is lying – Leo true emotions are technically revealed as he feels jealous due to be in love with her
  • ‘Why can’t a blind girl work here?’ – Mei stands up for herself which Jin likes

 

SOUND:

  • Opens with classical Chinese orchestra
  • Song lyrics that Mei sings
  • Distant sounds of laughter
  • Magical treatment to the sound one instrument echoes but not the rest – highly stylised sound scape
  • diegetic music
  • talking sets up the deception
  • “A second glance leaves the whole nation in ruins”

 

MESSAGES/MEANINGS/RESPONSE:

  • Aesthetics: set (auteur), colour, elaborateness
  • Aesthetics: dedicates 3-4 minutes to a dance sequence

 

REPRESENTATION – GENDER:

  • women laughing as they lose tug of war against a single man (Jin)
  • He undresses Mei with his sword
  • Women all try and tear Jin away form hurting Mei
  • She’s arrested for being indecently dresses, but it’s not her fault – plan to arrest her then to ‘save’ her??
  • women are giggling, frivolous, named after flowers
  • women scared of the men
  • women falling over Jin

 

CONTEXTS:

  • Tang Dynasty – Peony Pavilion  may seem over the top and stylised, but it has an element of truth. Correct representation.
  • Actress is in Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

 

Middle:

Cinematography:

  • close-up of the bamboo going through the bamboo and smashing on the bamboo – tension
  • long shot/extreme long shot of her being surrounded – link to other title
  • high key lighting
  • long shots to close ups of their faces when they are trapped
  • close up of them holding hands

 

Mise en Scene

  • shot on location in a bamboo forest
  • women – house of flying daggers – rescue them, standing together in a line – unstoppable (bar main three who are stood further forward)
  • flying daggers
  • bamboo cage
  • claustrophobic feel – then the HOFD show up with a lightness in the background

 

Performance

  • martial arts – Wuxia – wire work
  • mixture of special effects and wire work
  • Mei is acting blind still
  • Foreshadowing –  Jin throws the sword past Mei and hits the tree
  • Holding hands
  • The army/police fall down together x3
  • Mei’s fighting the urge to look at him – keeping up the facade

 

Editing

  • reduced cutting rate
  • slow-motion shots – flying people after being kicked, bamboo smashed against the bamboo, bamboo running together (with slow music when they are running together)

 

Sound

  • swords swooshing
  • clinging etc. – utilised to reinforce the idea that she’s blind when paired with the action-reaction shot of leaves falling, etc and the close up of her reaction
  • it’s from Mei’s perspective – heightened sound effects – she has to focus on sound (far away and close up has the same foregrounding)
  • no non-diegetic music (before Jin)
  • screaming
  • punctuation sound when Jin comes to save Mei
  • diegetic sound when Jin’s fighting
  • Whistling – throw bamboo call
  • when they’re trapped, the song she danced to plays
  • hear the dagger coming

 

Genre

  • Wuxia and wire work

 

Meanings/Messages/Response/Themes

  • politics and romance
  • deception

 

Representation

  • Jin/Mei/Leo represents the youth?
  • Mei is strong and powerful
  • House of Flying Daggers people/women contrast the women at the Peony Pavillion
  • How the film is reflective of Chinese culture, and how it is a Chinese film

 

Contexts

  • Oppressive, trapped, chased – regime?

 

Ending:

Cinematography 

 

  • Extreme long shot of Jin and Leo fighting with the contrast of the snow on the ground and the autumn coloured trees.
  • Mid shots of the fighting
  • Close up of the swords intertwining
  •  Mid shot of a drop of blood on the snow from Leo’s dagger
  • Close up showing that Leo didn’t throw the dagger he wanted to kill her. Mei smiles, she keeps them both alive.
  • Close up of Leo’s face when Mei is dying in Jin’s arms
  • Close up of Leo dropping the dagger
  • Extreme long shot of Leo walking away
  • Extreme long shot of Jin holding Mei
  • Camera tracks round as they elbow each other
  • Sequence of crash zooms
  • Close up of Mei crying
  • Series of mid shots and close ups of the three individually and then an extreme close up
  • Close up of eyes – reaction – crash zooms
  • Extreme long shot – almost triangle like – Jin throws his sword and moves closer to Leo, trying to help.
  • Circling camera
  • Close up/mid shot of Leo’s angry face then close up  of the blood he has drawn from Jin
  • Camera tracks around them when they have stabbed each other in the back

 

Mise en Scene 

 

  • Snowing (happened on set). The blood from Mei with the snow was foreshadowed at the beginning.
  •  contrast of the snow on the ground and the autumn coloured trees.
  • Army with their swords getting ready to attack the HOFD is the only thing we see of that attack. It’s about the romance story really. Plus, we probably know who will win anyway. The raid was set up as the point of the movie at the beginning, this is now cast aside.
  • Blood flying across the scene
  • Blood on the snow from the men (foreshadowed)
  • Drop of blood on the snow
  • Daggers hits the blood in the air – slow mo
  • Blood pours from Mei
  • Different from the bamboo fight scene. No wire work. Less special effects but still some. Bloodier and more brutal.
  • White is a funeral colour for the Chinease
  • Dagger sticking up might by symbolic of death – bad luck to leave chopsticks sticking up because they look like incense which get burned at funerals??
  • Notches on the sword – isn’t a ballet like scene that’s pretty it’s a fight to the death
  • Repeated cutting each other’s shoulder and blood
  • Jin cuts off Leo’s hat that represents his status
  • In previous scenes they have used nature as a weapon, the snow is like nature fighting back against the injustice of the situation??

 

Sound 

 

  • Loud foley sword sounds but only when they clash
  • Diegetic screaming
  • High pitched singing – holding long notes and snowy landscape over the fight scene
  • Orchestral music when Mei gets up – we’ve heard it before – music about the love triangle/ tragic song of the film
  • ‘You shouldn’t have come back’ repeated from earlier
  • No music when Mei has hit the tree and before? Jin is running to Mei and holding her
  • He cries holding her
  • Jin sings Mei the song from the beginning to Mei while holding her as she dies
  • ‘ I came back, for you, my love’ – romance genre
  • Instrument playing over those ready to attack the HOFD is the same as the ones from the opening – history and politics – then it changes to the romance story
  • Magical sound of the blade – sound of Leo’s (fake – tricks us) and Mei’s

 

Performance 

  • They fight despite being injured. Originally they were set up to be on the same side.
  • Mei starts to get up
  • Mei hits the tree – romance not politics – not picking a side or an accident. It was going to hit the dagger as shown by the blood. Leo’s final deceit.
  • Leo walks away (stumbling)
  • Different from the bamboo fight scene. No wire work. Less special effects but still some.
  • Both Leo and Jin stab each other at the same time while facing back to back. They then remove the swords at the same time. They are equals. Betrayed each other.
  • Leo removes his dagger
  • Leo and Jin both being equally damaged in the same way etc
  • Leo and Jin are different. Jin shows a softer side, he runs over to Mei and cries. Leo just leaves – he’s bitter, his undercover work has left the relationship with Mei stale, he’s hurt. Maybe it’s saying something about it not being what’s happened to you, but how you deal with it?
  • Close up showing that Leo didn’t throw the dagger he wanted to kill her. Mei smiles, she keeps them both alive. Leo deceives. Mei is selfless.
  • Leo can’t look
  • Left and right movement throughout the film. Leo turns right and leaves. Jin breaks this and goes to Mei.
  • Fighting feels less choreographed than earlier in the movie. Bloodier. Gritty. Harsh. Contrasts.
  • Close up/mid shot of Leo’s angry face then close up  of the blood he has drawn from Jin

 

Editing 

  • Slow motion of them punching/kicking sometimes??
  • Slow motion of the dagger
  • Special effects of throwing the dagger and it hitting the blood in the air
  • Editing compacts the different areas (bamboo forest and open space by tree of forest)
  • Fade from snow covered to snow storm
  • Fade to black
  • Break of continuity for effect – edit the same fight moment twice – crash into each other- emphasis
  • Slow motion of edited blood when they slash one another
  • Treats both men equally
  • Conversation between Mei and Jin

 

Meanings and Response

 

  • Aesthetics

 

Representation 

 

  • Women as strong and with their own feelings and motivations

 

Context 

 

  • Political context

 

 

Context:

Historical:

 

During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1978) the Beijing Film Academy closed, hardly any films were made. The Academy reopened in 1978. For 10 years the teachers there had not had any students. They did want to resume teaching in the old way, which, against the new styles emerging from Hong Kong and elsewhere now appeared old fashioned. Like their counterparts in other cinemas they wanted to experiment. In 1982 the first academy students since the reopening graduated. These were the so-called “5th Generation” and included Chen Kaige and Zhang Yimou. The 5th generation had been through the hardships and upheavals of the Cultural Revolution. Their reaction was to make “exploratory films” that would examine issues so far unexplored in Chinese cinema. The Fifth Generation became the first Chinese film-makers to achieve fame and become widely known outside China. China was the subject of their films, although very different view of China than the socialist realism of Mao before the Cultural Revolution.

 

Political:

 

After the Cultural Revolution foreign films were imported to supply cinemas. Discussions were held concerning artistic freedom. Zhang’s earlier films were often criticised by the government for their treatment of the realities of social

life in China. Since then he has enjoyed huge success with his wuxia films, example of global or transnational cinema’s demand for ethnic cultural elements and lustrous visuals. “Exotic”and “arty” China, popular with audiences.

 

Technological: 

 

Use of CGI and digital effects and wire work enhance acrobatics and fantasy.

 

Institutional

 

Half the world’s films are produced on the continent of Asia. India, Japan, Thailand, South Korea and the 3 Chinese cinemas of Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan all have large film industries. Chinese: The “home” audience for these films is potentially huge; cinema-goers in the region spend millions per year on cinema tickets. The industry has invested in digital cinema and the revival of Chinese language films.

 

Zhang Yimou’s Visual Style and Aesthetic:

 

  • Elaborate sets 
  • Brilliant costumes 
  • Brilliant scenery – frequently outside?
  • Use of lots of colour 
  • Frequently working with cinematographer: Xiaoding Zhao   

 

Representation of Men and Women: 

 

Courtesans were renowned for their polite behaviour. However, the courtesans were known to dominate conversations with the elite men. They weren’t scared to criticize male guests who spoke too much or too loudly, boasted too much, or whose rude behaviour had ruined dinner for everyone. This validates “House of Flying Daggers” as an accurate historic re-imagination of the attitudes of the time.”

 

Tang Dynasty:

 

    • The Tang Dynasty is often considered a “golden age” of Chinese civilization during which areas of culture as well as civilization flourished 

 

  • Literature, poetry, painting, commerce, science and innovation 
  • Bordellos of the time were places of beauty and artistic expression, just like the one depicted in the film. The head mistresses of bordellos had wealth and power. Courtesans were intelligent, artful singers and poets who entertained guests with their skills and conversation.

 

 

Cast: 

 

  • Well known and loved actors 

 

Pan’s Labyrinth: Revision Notes

Aesthetics:

The aesthetics are the ‘look and feel’ of the film, during the ending scene, the film form elements all work together to make the audience feel certain ways as well there being links to other movies that Del Toro has taken inspiration from. Del Toro is an auteur, the input he put into the scene shapes everything that you see, hear and feel and it was like this throughout the film.

The mise en scene and visual style of the final scene, when Ofelia is in the afterlife place is golden and red. Ofelia’s dress is red and gold (contrasting to her usual green dresses) links her to the fantasy world in the audiences minds and gives a warm and comforting feeling in the audience as they are the opposite of cold colours such as blue, which is associated with the real world; the yellow high-key lighting of the afterlife contrasting with the blue low-key lighting of when Ofelia is dying also does this; it also combines the magical and real world as parallels and the contrast between the fantasy and horror elements of the film. The colours from the mise en scene and lighting (and the high-key lighting) makes the audience happier, and we feel a sense of relief as we know that Ofelia is safe; it also gives a sense that Ofelia has been reborn. As well as this, Ofelia’s red shoes which are a part of mise en scene link to The Wizard of Oz and the idea of going home, suggesting that Ofelia is now home with her family and that everything is okay.

The room with her parents is church like. Their are stained glass windows and the people sit on what looks like pews. This contrasts to the church symbolism in the paleman scene, where the negative views to the church during the Spanish civil war was portrayed. The positive church design, suggests to the audience that Ofelia is going to be happier, therefore making the audience feel happy. This religious symbolism is a del Toro aesthetic/ a Del Toro-ism, he often includes religious symbolism in his movies; one other movie where he uses religious symbolism is in The Devils Backbone, which is described as a sister film to Pan’s Labyrinth as it covers similar topics such as the Spanish Civil War and uses similar techniques such as the low key lighting.

The only off-putting feeling that the audience would get is from the height of the chairs being different which we see through a long shot. The king, Ofelia’s dad, has the highest chair. Possibly suggesting that the patriarchy system still exists in the afterlife and possibly some sexism as well. This could link to the after effects of the Spanish Civil war, and how even though it ended in 1939, issues were still existent. Another audience interpretation of the high chairs is that the representation of age has come to a positive conclusion, Ofelia was greeted like an adult and not a child (linking to the bildungsroman genre) suggesting that Ofelia was finally not spoken down upon because of being a child again making the audience feel happier. The chairs could also be tall because of the narrative and plot, a suggestion of how Ofelia has proved herself, the chairs to the audience appear impossible to sit on, but Ofelia has proven herself as the lost princess and therefore is not troubled by this.

The motif of the lullaby that Mercedes sings and is used throughout the film gives a sense of how peoples choices have been taken away from them because of the war, as the song has no words suggesting they had no say (and specifically the effect that war had on children which Del Toro wanted to explore). The film highlights how people should disobey and have their own choice, and it’s shown to the audience that Ofelia has this now as the lullaby stops after the she enters the fantasy world until the sound bridge of her coming back into the reality world. This again makes the audience happy and feel comforted knowing that Ofelia will have a better life now.

While running away from Vidal, the blue low-key lighting makes the scene cold, harsh, and emotionless, it makes the audience feel afraid and sad. This has links to fascism and the Spanish Civil War as throughout the film, the blue low-key lighting has been linked to Vidal and therefore fascism, the connotations of the colour blue present fascism negatively and as something that has lack of morals (cold). Normally, the reality world is presented as being just as dangerous as this fascism filled and dark world such as in the paleman scene, but the final fantasy scene suggests that Ofelia is now safe and going to be happy. However, the cinematography is also used to show how Ofelia is not alone, the mid-shot of her and Mercedes when Ofelia is dying contrasts to the mid-shot at the beginning of the film where Ofelia is dying alone, giving a bitter sweet feeling as we are glad to know that Ofelia isn’t alone, but she’s dead so it’s too late and almost meaningless. However, this does provide a circular structure to the film as it ends leaving the audience feeling as though the film is definitely concluded.

Some audience members may argue that the ending shows how it’s all in Ofelia’s head. The editing means that Ofelia is dying (which is a Gothic/horror element), then she and the audience see the afterlife, then she dies, suggesting that she imagined it to herself. Plus, the world is too perfect, all of the fairies are there despite some of them being dead, suggesting that the flood of yellow light that took her into this fantasy was her beginning to imagine rather than being “the light at the end of the tunnel”, and that she was imagining a happy place that she’d rather be in. Some audiences may also feel that the entire film has been in her head as she dies, because the film begins and ends with her in the same place. These are ways that the film is left ambiguous, causing the watcher to rethink the movie and be curious.

 

Representation:

In the opening sequence of Del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth the audience learns about representation of gender, age, ethnicity and about fascists.

In terms of gender, the film sets up gender stereotypes and then tears them down later in the film to show issues with sexism against women and toxic masculinity. One of the first things we see is Carmen, an adult pregnant woman, needing help from a man with her pregnancy issues. This presents the stereotype that women are in need of men’s help and cannot cope alone. The character Vidal, only cares about his son. He removes his glove to touch Carmen’s belly which is more personal than with Ofelia as he puts his gloves back on before greeting her and crushing her hand. He also doesn’t great Carmen lovingly, he forces her to do things she doesn’t want to such as sit in the wheelchair, ‘Do it for me’, for the sake of the baby being okay. This controllement  is also a stereotype of men with women, that women are more passive. He gives the baby bump, a better greeting than the other characters and throughout the film he makes it very clear that when it comes to trouble in the pregnancy, the doctor should save the baby. Suggesting, that Vidal views women as baby making machines and only cared about passing down his family name. Plus, he never considers that the baby might be a girl, he always assumes that it’s a boy, showing the stereotype that boys are more desirable and the one that should pass down the family name like Vidal wants. Therefore overall, women have been shown to be the weaker, more passive and the undesirable gender and that men have control and are more aggressive. This stereotype is broken in the rest of the as women such as Mercedes, surpass expectation and have a key role in taking down Vidal and breaks all gender stereotypes and Ofelia, is able to do the three dangerous tasks as a female also breaking down these stereotypes.

The audience immediately knows about Vidal and his men as fascists because of mise en scene,  the cars have the fascist symbol on them. Plus, the cars themselves are expensive suggesting the title of Vidal as a captain and how he, a man, has power. We learn immediately through Vidal’s performance that he is a leader and punctual as his first line is ’15 minutes late’ and he’s watching his watch rather than the car with his wife and child in it, which  presents him as a cold character. It also suggests that the people in this film feel that men are fit to be leaders and women aren’t as Vidal as a man is captain but the lower down workers such as cleaners and cooks are women (such as Mercedes). Showing this unfair treatment and the real side to women throughout the film .breaks these gender stereotypes.

The representation of age in the opening scene shows the impossible standards that children are supposed to meet. Ofelia has to help take care of her sick mother, which is an adult responsibility. Plus, her mum Carmen doesn’t want her to be reading the fairy tale books suggesting Carmen wants her to act more grown up in-front of Vidal. However, Carmen also talks down on Ofelia and Ofelia is presented as having the curiosity of a child as she wonders off immediately to explore. Therefore, Ofelia acts both childlike and mature, and is treated both like a child and an adult, suggesting the impossible standard that has been placed upon children. This has links to one of the film genres being bildungsroman, Ofelia is becoming a woman and more mature and therefore has to overcome this complicated boundary between child and woman.

Ofelia, a child, suggests the hope that children are to the future of Spain by rejecting fascism. We know that Vidal is a fascist and that his men are fascists, and we learn that Ofelia instead is more left wing. When she greats Vidal, she goes to shake his hand using her left hand suggesting that she is more left wing, contrasting to the fascist Vidal who says she’s supposed to use her right hand, linking him to fascism. This could be the film suggesting the end to the Spanish Civil War aftermath and the toxic views such as fascism coming to an end with the next generation.

Although Vidal is evil, he is a victim of toxic masculinity. This is one reason why he treats women as though he is above them in status just by being a man. His father, would have given him the idea that he needs to act like a man and die like a man, he gave Vidal a watch that he smashed when he died so that Vidal would know when he died. Vidal goes on to try and do this during the ending, showing that the toxic masculinity had been passed down to him. He also tries to pass it down to his son, by asking Mercedes to tell him when he died, Mercedes refuses marking the end to the passing of toxic masculinity. Vidal trying to give commands throughout the film and be punctual all the time is a suggestion of how he believes he has to act like a man.

The characters are all Spanish and white, this could have a contextual link  to Spain at the time the film was set, after the Spanish Civil War which ended in 1939.

 

Context:

In Del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth, the paleman sequence portrays many different contextual links and has use of themes that run throughout the movie.

The paleman’s room itself is similar to that of a church, it represents the critical view of the church that was held during the Spanish Civil War which the film was set shortly after. When Ofelia firsts open the door, the reverse tracking shot allows the audience to see how big the space is and how similarly designed it is to a church, such as, it has big pillars. In the paleman’s actual room, the horrific pictures on the ceiling are in the same position and designed the same (apart from the actual image) as religious images in church. Plus, the big table that the paleman is sitting on, could also be a reference to the famous last supper table painting, the food being red suggests the negative opinion on the church as red connotates to danger. Plus, the stigmata holes in the paleman’s hands have a link to Jesus being crucified. Therefore, placing such a violent and visually disturbing character (sagging skin, skinny, sharp fingers) in a religious room with connection to Jesus, is implying the critical views of the church at that time.

The gruesome images around the room not only make the audience feel disturbed but have a contextual link to the Spanish artist Francisco Goya who painted Saturn eating his son. The interpretation of this painting is that the Titan feared that his children would overthrow him and therefore ate them.  This was used in Pan’s Labyrinth as it links to world war 2 and the Nazis. They targeted children because of their alleged membership in political, biological or racial groups. The effect that war has on children is atrocious, and it’s something that Del Toro often wants to explore in his films. In Pan’s Labyrinth, he showed the effect that war had on Ofelia with characters such as Vidal and the many references to fascism and the dangers of it including within this scene. Another film where he explored this was ‘The Devils Backbone’ which is often described as a sister film to Pan’s Labyrinth.  Another link to the holocaust in the paleman scene is the pile of shoes, as it has links to the gas chambers. However, another interpretation of this is that they are the shoes of the incorrect princesses, and instead link to the theme of horror and fairy tale rather than a political and historical link.

In the paleman scene, the mise en scene identifies which door Ofelia should use to get they key in the book that she opens. However, she disobeys this and opens the left door, it was this disobedience that allowed her to succeed in the task; suggesting that obeying for the sake of obeying is morally wrong. Obedience and choice are a theme throughout the movie, and obedience is typically linked to Vidal and fascism, it portrays the idea that having no choice and obeying without considering morals and fascism as wrong. The doctor explicitly tells Vidal, ‘Captain, to obey – just like that – for obedience’s sake… without questioning… That’s something only people like you do.’ supports the message that fascism and obeying is wrong. However, Ofelia doesn’t obey, she picks the left door, which links her to left wing politics and therefore not fascism unlike Vidal and suggests hope in the future for Spain as the children will make positive changes. The book that she found the task in, also had the paleman’s arms in the shape of fallopian tubes which supports the genre of bildungsroman throughout the film.

In this sequence, the barrier between the two worlds is clearly defined. One way this is done is when the parallel action shot takes the audience out of the paleman’s room and into Ofelia’s room where we see that the time has run out. The change from high key lighting with yellow and red to low key blue lighting emphasises the separation between the two worlds. However, the blue low-key lighting does still suggest coldness and dangers because it’s connotations which supports that the two worlds are just as dangerous as one another, which is something Del Toro tried to explore. We also get this separation when Ofelia is climbing out of the paleman room and there’s a mid-shot of Ofelia where her top half is in the real world and her legs are in the fantasy place, this give the sense to the audience that both worlds are real as we see them coexist at the same time. They way that Ofelia climbs up to get out of the paleman’s room gives the suggestion of hell, as well the fire which is emphasised by its loud foley sound. This connects back to the critical opinions on the church during the Spanish Civil War and shows the audience how much danger Ofelia is in, causing worry and tension. This religious symbolism is a Del Toro-ism which also appears in the sister film to Pan’s Labyrinth, ‘The Devils Backbone’.

 

Blade Runner: Revision Notes

 

New Hollywood 

  • studio’s built themselves up with influence from the french new wave including non-linear narrative, and sex, drugs and violence. French New Wave changed eastern and western film.
  • fears of the time were exploited by blockbusters
  • still has 180 rule
  • not just about driving the story forward, also aesthetic experience
  • low budget to high budget
  • moral ambiguity of the protagonist
  • film school people like Spielberg
  • Also can be used as a form of escapism, but a different type
  • influence of TV

 

Opening: 

Auteur Signature Film Form

  • long establishing shot
  • film noir style – dull,cold and detective in his office vibe *
  • German expressionism *
  • arc (?) lights and strong shadows
  • low key lighting
  • shifts in genre – science fiction/film noir *
  • neon colours
  • ECU pf the eye with flame going around the side – as we don’t know who it is, it could just be in the movie because it looks nice which Scott really cares about. It could be about question of identity as well.It doesn’t add to the narrative *

New Hollywood Film Form

  • composite images and lens flare
  • text exposition*
  • non-diegetic heart beating sound (during/start of turtle story)*
  • machine beeping
  • low key lighting – LA – cold
  • slow paced shots – low cutting rate
  • no explanation of why LA is like that*
  • no explanation of how Tyrel corp is so powerful
  • Pyramids – power symbol*
  • fire coming out of stacks*
  • flying cars – metropolis*
  • mundane grey office – parody of modern day office that contrasts to outside. Isolated from everyone else
  • light coming into the office but it is dark outside
  • action reaction shot (CU and MS) of talking*
  • heart beeping*
  • double speak

Production Context 

  • forced perspective – miniatures of the city made with LED lights (computer moved the camera?)*
  • Voight – Rompf machine made to look like it was breathing – links to the replicants*
  • low key lighting and fog to hide the set*
  • Budget change*
  • Song made for the film

Themes and motifs 

  • themes – neo-liberalism, fear of technology, fear of something new, fossil fuels are used in the world which is dirty (environmental fears)*

Representation 

  • no children – fear of AI/replicants taking the place of children and/or the replicants are the children/represent children*
  • the officer is a man
  • woman on the advertisement – only woman we have seen so far and advertising is dominating the world in general*
  • asian influence*

Political Context 

  • Asian influence*
  • Resemblance of Tyrel building to cathedral of light (Nazi’s) – looks similar and the light at the top – power that it represents as well*
  • cold war*
  • fear of technology – nuclear bomb and cold war*
  • in the 80’s technical advancements were mainstream*
  • Tyrel’s power – capitalism*
  • reliance on fossil fuels – no wind farms, fire*
  • neo-liberalism*

 

Middle: 

Auteur Signature Film Form 

  • neon colours outside of his window*
  • Genre shifts – science fiction, film noir*
  • Strong directional low key lighting

New Hollywood Film Form 

  • non-diegetic choir singing*
  • unicorn – high key lighting*
  • close up of pictures – he thinks it is his family etc.*
  • minimal and wooden performance – replicant? wooden performance relates back to the replicant at the beginning*
  • piano – evokes memory in himself*
  • gun and whisky – noirish character*
  • unicorn is fantastical yet it’s the only “real” animal in the film*
  • only real nature (trees) in the film*
  • morally ambiguous/compromised*
  • cross fade – like a flashback*
  • picture is labelled
  • the news paper on the TV type thing when he is searching is written in ideograms

Production Context 

  • unicorn scene – another movie – legend test shot*

Themes and motifs 

  • theme of surveillance – search light*
  • piano*
  • character haunted by memories*
  • unicorn motif*
  • technological advancement and high tec  – fear of it*
  • existentialism theme*

Representation 

  • apartment is decorated with Eastern looking furniture and ornaments (e.g. Buddah head and bonzi tree)*
  • women represented as exotic (?)

Political Context 

  • mise en scene – mix of cultures  – passed Cold War*

 

Ending: 

Auteur Signature Film Form 

  • heavy  shadows – German Expressionism*
  • low key lighting and high contrast
  • Baroque Style – elaborate set*
  • Use of colour (blue and orange ) – in the back of the corridor ?
  • rain dripping sound down wall – close sonic perspective – tension*
  • beautiful cinematography in the finger braking scene (close sonic perspective as well)*
  • Genre shifts – science fiction, horror, Western (gun)*
  • beams of light from behind the window
  • blue tinted lighting
  • neon lights in the background when climbing out of the window*
  • Close up of his hand when pulling himself up – like in Alien*
  • the search light has no narrative logic – they are fighting but nothing happens when they are seen by the search light. Suggesting whoever is in control of the search light doesn’t care about violence.*
  • blue harsh theatre lighting
  • close sonic perspective*
  • neon TDK sign*

New Hollywood Film Form

  • ‘aren’t you the good man?’ – protagonist isn’t good and moral ambiguity of protagonist – directly questioning*
  • ‘that’s the spirit’ response to being attack by Deckard, possibly saying that he has the power of a replicant but Deckard doesn’t know yet?*
  • ‘that hurt’, ‘where are you going?’ and calling Deckard’s actions ‘irrational’ suggests a humanness to Roy and suggests that Deckard is a replicant*
  • non-diegetic sound like bees
  • howling – supernatural like*
  • contrasting aesthetic of the building to the neon world
  • representation of LA – raining*
  • lack of clothing – symbol of natural state and understanding who he is?
  • bell chiming
  • thunder and lightning?
  • fans – industrial feel
  • futuristic non-diegetic sounds*
  • violence – French influence e.g. Roy touches Pris’s wound, braking fingers etc*
  • ‘that’s what it is to be a slave’ – non-diegetic choir like note*
  • Japanese theatre like music – oriental theme, east meets west like the mise en scene throughout the film – cold war*
  • hero saved by an unexpected person*
  • nemesis has a loss, trauma, scene – Roy is a child in an adults body trying to come to terms with mortality and the death of Pris*
  • shift in protagonist – Roy is a more heroic figure*
  • parallel action of Roy and Deckard*
  • Parallel of them both trying to fix their hands (both have damaged hands)  – replicants, same values, life value, just as much good or bad as people*
  • mechanical old sound – adds to the  coldness*
  • dramatic, tense and a lot about narrative*
  • nail in hand – stigmata – religious symbol, sacrificing himself ?, child of God?, a sense of some innocence?. Plus, Roy previously said ‘6,7, go to hell or go to heaven’*
  • symbolic that it is raining
  • Gaff shows up when everyone is dead
  • day time when he looks for Rachel
  • tracking shot of room focusing in on body under the sheet – symbolic of death*
  • mechanical sounds and blueness on TV – coldness
  • robot making poetry
  • narrative flip – hunter becomes the hunted – narrative was centred around Deckard finding and killing replicants*
  • choir singing when he lands – nail in hand – miraculous and religious link
  • hanging off building – narrative device and possibly a metaphor*
  • Roy is in silhouette and low angle shot  – dangerous*
  • Roy picks Deckard up with the nail hand
  • dove and nail – inner conflict ? – dove – freedom and peace symbol*
  • action reaction shots – highest tension of the movie – climax of the narrative*
  • living in fear is ‘what it is like to be a slave’*
  • change in tone – more high key lighting, music more major key*
  • slow motion footage – Roy looking down in the rain
  • ‘time to die’ is Roy’s last words – links humans and replicants, significance of life, acceptance of mortality*
  • day time shot of letting the dove go – found freedom/peace in death, symbolic of replicants having souls?*
  • cross fade of Roy and Deckard that acts as an action reaction shot- creates a connection between them (both scared of mortality?) – Roy is dead and Deckard is looking at him – feels united with him?, both replicants, both feel the same way etc*

Production Context 

  • W.B. Burbank set*
  • inspired by/a reference to metropolis (outside the building)*
  • matte painting – background?*

Themes and Motifs 

  • search light – surveillance*
  • unicorn SILVER origami – suggests that Deckard  is a replicant because it implies that Gaff new about the dream that Deckard had previously, suggesting it was an implanted memory. It also shows that Gaff knew Rachel was there, yet spared her. There is a voice over of Gaff in this moment of earlier on when he said ‘too bad she won’t live, but then again who does?’ (ironic) this paired with Deckard’s nod suggesting his awareness of being a replicant gives the idea that being a replicant doesn’t matter, you’re still mortal and feel the same feelings (pr maybe even less) as a human*
  • Japanese theatre like music – oriental theme, east meets west like the mise en scene throughout the film – cold war*
  • environmentalism – fans – energy resource ?*
  • humans underestimating technology ?
  • existentialism and the value of being alive*

 

Representation 

  • ‘this is for Zora’ and ‘this is for Pris’  – women are avenged be men, men are left to fight. Plus, he doesn’t mention Leon*
  • man cries – good representation*
  • Rachel has been made passive throughout the whole movie*
  • he needs to help Rachel be safe*
  • children – performance is like a game of hide and seek*
  • Roy is a child in an adults body trying to come to terms with mortality and the death of Pris*
  • children – Roy’s nursery rhyme esque speech – ‘6,7, go to hell or go to heaven’*
  • replicants are represented as/are the representation of children, ‘that hurt’ – raw emotion, highly refined sense of right and wrong*
  • she loves him and trust him but why? – fugitive on the run and he owes her so she trusts him?*

 

Political Context 

  • Japanese theatre like music – oriental theme, east meets west like the mise en scene throughout the film – cold war*

 

More 

  • Speech that Howard wrote – machine which accepts its mortality*
  • co-operations in charge, no government?*
  • maths doesn’t add up of the number of replicants (said near the beginning of the film) unless Deckard is one of them?