Moon: Revision Notes

Opening:

Cinematography

  • blue light in the vehicle when he opens the hatch
  • Establishing shots
  • Opening is the only brightly coloured and saturated
  • Images taken from news footage (archive footage)
  • Animation
  • Outside has low key, high contrast lighting and inside has high key, low contrast lighting

Mise en Scene

  • space craft is less colourful (monochrome) than earth which makes it look lonely
  • In the title screen the earth looks small
  • Communication satellite
  • Shot of people on the beach with factories behind them shows the binary oppositions. Representing of people ignoring what’s happening in the rest of the world
  • Nearly 70% of the planet is represented as  West America
  • Logo significance – colour choices of grey/white/yellow, the moon sun representation and how the companies moon strategy is shown, white background links to modernism
  • Fairground/amusement park place which is brightly lit
  • Fires with diesel like technology
  • beautiful nature shot
  • From desert to a greening desert
  • New York with a full moon
  • Brightly lit city
  • Hal is like Gertie
  • Gertie’s faces look like the faces Sam draws on the walls later on
  • Outside is dirty/dark/natural which contrasts to the white/geometric inside however this clean white look doesn’t last long – Sam has a dirty baseball cap/janitor suit/space suit and wears trainers,  he has defaced the dashboard (?) with the Mark (the apostle names are used Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John). Plus, Gertie initially looked clean but now he is dirty and has post it notes on him
  • Lunar logo everywhere
  • Fluffy dice in vehicle – silly/irony or luck and chance

Performance

  • Gertie willingly helps Sam, will always help his needs, ‘Okay Sam’
  • Sam is energetic which contrasts to the end of the film and links him to the other clone Sam
  • Isolation (only the robot is there with him)
  • Sam running on a running machine is a metaphor of him not going anywhere and not having a real destination
  • Sam is leaning over in his seat – tired etc

Editing

  • Infomercial gives context to why he is in the moon and contrasts to the isolation etc in the rest of the film. Montage sequence
  • Montage sequence
  • Graphic match of the Ferris wheel to the sun which is linking the project to something happy. But the Ferris wheel (?) is called Tsunami which could suggest the disaster that is coming. (Graphic match of brightly lit world to the sun)
  • Graphic animated sequence after montage
  • Setting up moral questioning

Sound

  • music – fast arpeggios are playful and happy contrast to the minor piano music after
  • Long electric space like noises
  • Overhead speaker speaking about being offline links to the rest of the film
  • ‘There was a time when energy was a dirty word’
  • When it talks about producing energy, there is a full moon above New York (consider connotations of New York)
  • Montage interacts with the dialogue
  • Drums – work/productive

Narrative

  • basic exposition
  • Morality about exploiting the moon – swapping one finite resource for another, they haven’t learned
  • Binary oppositions – human/machine, clean white design/space, have’s/have not’s, West/East, nature/technology, light/dark, wealth/suffering, white/black, Earth/Moon

Age

-use children in the advert for emotional purposes
Sam is an adult

Ideology

  • Binary oppositions – human/machine, clean white design/space, have’s/have not’s, West/East, nature/technology, light/dark, wealth/suffering, white/black, Earth/Moon
  • Environmentalism
  • Capitalism (Lunar Industries) and how not everyone benefits. The running machine and Sam metaphor
  • Modernism – idea that there is a logical answer to everything (whit background)
  • Patriarchy
  • Socialism
  • Marxism (predictions) –  (1) communism and everyone profiting from labour and (2) technological utopia and democracy – the empty promise that technology will make everything better?

 

Middle:

Cinematography

  • High key lighting/ functional lighting
  • Over the shoulder shot
  • Close up of blood
  • Close up of the Sam’s faces when they are about to fight
  • Close ups when fighting
  • When Sam 2 is searching, there are many mid shots and longs shots of him in the centre of the screen which feels claustrophobic
  • Mid shot of Sam 2 searching under the counter but you see all of him – claustrophobic
  • Long shot of them fighting to the side with lots of empty space make the audience see they are fighting over nothing and they have just each other and should be working together
  • Close up of knife
  • The camera moves down to see the knife rather than have another shot

 

Mise en scene

  • Model – represents all of the Sam’s, could show how Sam could have been an artist, destruction is shocking, of a known place?, suburban and perfect
  • Original clone is dirtier
  • Chair – Borman in 2001: A Space Odyssey and anachronistic (out of time)
  • Clothing – branding
  • Blood – problem with clone

 

Editing

  • Montage of him looking around and jump cuts – don’t have change in shot length – idea of fragmentation and fast paced editing

 

Performance

  • New clone often above (taller than) original Sam (proxemics)
  • Irony that they are fighting themselves rather than working together
  • Chucks model instead of gently lifting it
  • Not looking in the mirror (the mirror was an opportunity for Sam to analyse the moment) and the mirror image shows multiple Sam’s
  • Sam watches Mary Tyler More as distraction (trash tv) – media to passivy the workers
  • Both Sam’s attack from behind at least once

 

Sound

  • Builds tension
  • Beeping
  • Minor piano comes back – when looking (music)
  • Eerie noises
  • Close sonic perspective of all the thing being messed with – claustrophobic
  • ‘Eliza arrival in 13 (or 15?) hours’

 

Gender

  • Not necessarily in this scene, but throughout the film, the women (wife and daughter) are seen as the prize/reward
  • Possibly the male stereotype of aggressiveness

 

Narrative

  • Discussing conspiracies and how the company is using clones to save money (hating of capitalism)
  • Sam 1 is in denial – sticking to idea of ideal town and life he will go back to (model)
  • ‘Eliza arrival in 13 hours’ – tension, like a bomb countdown

 

Ideology

  • Sam 1 and Sam 2 have different points of view (Nihilism – Sam 1 believes life is meaningless because he knows he is a clone?)
  • Marxist – worker has limited creativity and is not benefiting from working
  • Discussing conspiracies and how the company is using clones to save money (hating of capitalism)

 

Ending:

 

Cinematography

  • Eliza ship has a spider like shadow
  • Long shot of Sam 2 leaving which Sam 1 sees
  • Long shot of Sam 2 in the building – empty without Sam 1
  • Yellow and blue lighting when Sam 2 is leaving
  • Zoom in to a close up of the countdown
  • Close ups of Gerty could suggest a human quality to him?
  • Long shot of Sam 3 – meat – can’t see his face

 

Mise en scene

  • Sun glasses – cool gesture – persona
  • We see the countdown which contrasts to the emotional music
  • Sam 3 – we can’t see his face only body (meat), distant from us but the sounds of the arrival time suggests he is human and matters too
  • Gerty’s faces look like the ones that Sam 1 draws on the wall (on the wall, we can see rubbed out faces from where the previous Sam’s have drawn on the wall, as they all went through the same thing)
  • Eliza ship has a spider like shadow and a red flashing light which has connotations of danger
  • Rescue team have guns

 

Sound

  • Music – the peaceful music like a clockwork toy when Sam 3 wakes up – suggests falseness
  • When there is a long shot of Sam 3, we hear the arrival time which suggests he matter/is human too
  • “getting things done” music kicks in when the signal thing gets knocked over (?)
  • Drums – satellite working
  • Sad music when Sam 2 has left Sam 1 means that when we see the countdown, we don’t feel tense, it doesn’t matter as much anymore

 

Performance

  • ‘I hope everything on earth is everything you remember it to be’
  • Gertie helps – humanity ?
  • Taking the ‘kick me’ post it note off Gertie suggest Sam 2 felt a humanity in Gertie
  • Sam 2 prays before escaping
  • ‘We’re not programmed we’re people’

 

Editing

  • Parallel action of Sam 1,2 and 3
  • Parallel action of Eliza and machine and Sam 2 leaving

 

Narrative

  • Reference to the new Sam and programming
  • Sam played by the same actor
  • ‘We’re not programmed we’re people’
  • Parallel action
  • Sam 3’s humanity considered
  • Narrative repletion (new Sam)
  • Clone of Sam Bell has given evidence (V/O) but called ‘either a wacko or an illegal immigrant… lock him up’. The company claims to have changed the world but can’t change the people. The company probably won’t be shut down (determinism – no matter what Sam did he couldn’t have won). America. Compare ending to beginning.

 

Ideology

  • Existentialism – Sam 2’s purpose was to stand up for what was right
  • Determinism?
  • Compare beginning and end. Starts with energy problems and how Lunar Industries helps. Ends with illegal immigrant comment – didn’t change the people with the earth and nothing has changed (determinism)
  • Lunar Industries admit racism (?) (orientalism)
  • Wilful ignorance in humanity – ignore issue
  • Nihilism (?)

 

ISP 11: Documentary

Image result for bowling for columbine

Bowling For Columbine Questions:

  1. The key characteristics of the use of film form.
  • The use of archive and found footage 
  • Close-ups and mid-shots of the people talking 
  • Action reaction shots for conversations
  • Editing used to orchestrate a certain message and response from the audience. The intention is to make fun of gun lovers and supporters. 
  • Questions also used to orchestrate a certain message and responses from and to the audience. The intention is to make fun of gun lovers and supporters. 
  • The director is on screen. In terms of his performance, he handles guns which are the topic of the documentary. 

 

2. The extent to which each of the film form elements are used to create a sense of realism or to be expressive. 3. The extent to which the filmmaker is ‘saying something’ or creating a specific message.

The film form elements tend to be manipulated to orchestrate the message and meaning that the director wants. Although I agree with his message that guns being legal is insane, the documentary does take a biased side in presenting its information which can be criticised. Although, it does show the other side to through other people’s opinions that they interview. The editing and questions and the mot orchestrated to get the wanted response. It’s also often done for humorous purposes. However, despite being orchestrated what the documentary presents isn’t wrong.  

 

4. The apparent level of interaction and intervention between producer and subject.

The director is on screen interacting with the subjects. Whether this be having a conversation with them or interviewing them. He also interacts with the subject of the documentary, guns, and is open about his childhood and his use/previous use of guns. Moreover, the director is also the voiceover. His questions and the editing of his questions and voice over with the mise-en-scene are orchestrated to convey certain meanings. 

 

5. The key differences between these films and mainstream fiction features.

The director is on screen which doesn’t tend to happen in fiction features (bar a few). Plus, it’s purely discussing a reality. It’s not exploring real themes and messages but within a fictional plot and narrative. There’s use of found footage which doesn’t usually appear in fictional features. 

 

6. The key similarities and differences to mainstream news/media programming.

  • The use of interviewing subjects. 
  • The use of archive footage possibly. 
  • Possibly giving across a specific message deliberately.
  •  Exploring real things, not fiction. 

 

7. The extent to which digital filmmaking technology influenced, or could have influenced the form and outcomes of the film.

  • Later on in the documentary, there is an animated sequence 
  • The ability to edit what you have recorded in a way that possibly changes the situation to make it seem a certain way and/or emphasize the truth

 

Image result for divorce iranian style

 

Divorce, Iranian Style Questions: 

 

  1. The key characteristics of the use of film form.
  • Tends to be one take of a scene or edited one scene in a continuous way 
  • Use of close up and mid-shots 
  • Use of voiceover 

 

2. The extent to which each of the film form elements are used to create a sense of realism or to be expressive.

  • The film form just shows the reality. It’s not orchestrated in anyway. 
  • It uses continuity in its scenes to get across meaning

 

3. The extent to which the filmmaker is ‘saying something’ or creating a specific message.

  • The film maker is getting across the unfairness and inequality in regards to gender, specifically in divorce. This is conveyed without orchestrated editing, mise-en-scene or cinematography and through voice over. However, all any of it does is state and show the truth. 

 

4. The apparent level of interaction and intervention between producer and subject.

  • There is no interaction. It’s observational. 
  • The voiceover interacts with the audience. 

 

5. The key differences between these films and mainstream fiction features.

  • Not based in a fictional setting to get across its meaning and messages. 
  • What happens, happens. It’s not orchestrated. 
  • No plot. 

 

6. The key similarities and differences to mainstream news/media programming.

  • Getting across real information 
  • No interaction with the subject 
  • Long continuous scenes 

 

7. The extent to which digital filmmaking technology influenced, or could have influenced the form and outcomes of the film.

  • Made it easier to film
  • Could have been influenced by the use of multiple cameras

 

For more information about the directors:

Documentary Resource 3 – Filmmakers theories (1)

ISP 11: Response to ‘Amy’

 

Image result for amy documentary

‘Amy’ (Asif Kapadia) is a 2015 documentary created from found footage of Amy Winehouse telling the story of her career and how fame and some people around her aided her tragic early death.

I was hopeful going into ‘Amy’. Although not haven seen anything from the director Kapadia before I had high hopes that it was going to be a well-made film – I wasn’t wrong. The film did a fantastic job of capturing what Amy was like as a person, and what her desires were as an individual and professionally. It told the true story of how fame and a few people around her pushed her to the edge. It explores the heartbreaking moments were Amy was on the edge which builds and builds as the film continues. Ultimately coming to the incredibly tragic death of Amy which could have been avoided if things in her life had gone a different way.

The film impacts its audience hard with strong emotional blows that are emphasized by the fact it’s a recount of a true story. The use of archive footage is utilized not only in a way to get across the messages and story but to make it more emotional.

ISP 10 – House of Flying Daggers Aesthetics Essay

 

World Cinema: Discuss how aesthetics are used to communicate themes in your chosen films. Make detailed reference to particular sequences in your answer [40]

Aesthetics are incredibly important in the Paleman sequence of Del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth. For example, the use of colour. The mise-en-scene of the red food has connotations of danger, blood, and fear therefore creating tension and fear in the audience through aesthetics. Moreover, the mise-en-scene of the fire connotes the idea of hell, which links into the theme of religion that is explored throughout the film but is also another way of aesthetically creating fear in the audience. This Paleman’s room itself could be deemed similar to the church buildings due to the painting like murals around the room that were inspired by Goya’s painting of Saturn eating his son. This link to Christianity in such a horrific place could be a way of conveying negative attitudes about Christian’s lack of involvement during the war, which was also explored earlier in the movie. Aesthetically these elements of mise-en-scene are emphasised to the audience, only making them more disturbing, scary and building more tension. Such as, the foley sound of the hellish fire, and the non-diegetic (but possibly imagined) sound of the screaming children when Ofelia sees the pictures. The terror of the room conveyed through aesthetics links to the representation of children, as Ofelia is able to handle herself and escape from such a place as child suggesting children are strong and capable. In general, the room is decked with yellow, red and gold which are colours associated with the fantasy world while the real world is associated with blue and green. Del Toro created a place away from danger for Ofeli to escape to (blue has cold and harsh connotations), but the escaping place was also dangerous (red has violent connotations). However, by the end of the movie, this use of red, yellow and gold takes on a different aesthetics meaning and feels more passionate, warm, and safe. 

 

During the ending of Pan’s Labyrinth when Ophelia is running away from Vidal there is blue low-key lighting that makes the audience feel cold and fear for Ophelia as blue has the connotation of coldness and because blue is associated with Vidal, who is a dangerous fascist character throughout the movie. This lighting is repeated when Vidal shots Ofelia. This lighting shows that Ophelia is surrounded by the danger of fascists like Vidal and the effects of the Spanish Civil War which the film was set shortly after, the effect that war has on children is something that Del Toro often explores in his films such as The Devil’s Backbone. To contrast, the yellow flood of light that takes Ophelia into the magical world after being shot in which the lighting and mise en scene such as set design is yellow and red makes the audience feel calmer as it feels like Ophelia is safe now, she’s away from the dangers of fascism and the aftermath of the Spanish civil war. In this scene the mise en scene has references to other movies that Del Toro took inspiration from. Such as, Ophelia’s red shows link to ‘The Wizard of Oz’ and therefore the idea of going home, suggesting that Ophelia is home now and will be much happier. Despite it being a much happier place, the mise en scene does provide some discomfort to the audience. The chairs that Ophelia and her parents have suggest a hierarchy as the king is taller than the queen and princess. This represents the gender inequality that also existed in the real world which could be suggesting the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War as the problems didn’t stop immediately – even when Ophelia had entered a magical world/afterlife some problems still carried on making the audience feel sad. However, these chairs also provided closure to the bildungsroman genre/coming of age theme in the movie. Fallopian tubes were shown throughout such as with the fauns horns which was one way of highlighting that Ophelia was growing up and there’s chairs provide evidence to the audience that Ophelia has grown up as she is not greeted like a child but like an adult and must and can get to the high seat herself.

 

The ending of House of Flying Daggers conveys many things aesthetically to the audience. For example, the use of wire work in the rest of the movie, such as during the bamboo fight scene, helping to form the wuxia genre is changed for the ending of the movie. There is no wire work making the fighting seem more down to earth and realistic. There is also more mise en scene of blood than in the rest of the movie. This aesthetically makes the fight more brutal, which builds tension in the audience. This makes sense as it’s the climax of the movie. The snow, although not under the crews control, aesthetically made the scene more dramatic as did the use of non-diegetic music (one note being held at a time). The snow however did become a choice, as the close up of the drop of blood on the snow was foreshadowed right at the beginning during the text sequence. Moreover, the editing could also be interpreted as having an aesthetic impact on the audience. Such as, when Leo and Jin are edited to fall twice which emphasises the brutality of the fight. Plus, the camera circles around them when they have literally and metaphorically stabbed each other in the back. All of this aesthetically connotes  to the themes of deceit and betrayal. 

 

The Peony Pavilion aesthetically links to the Tang Dynasty period, also referred to as the ‘golden age’.  The mise-en-scene of the set design may seem extravagant with the richly coloured and patterned walls, floor, furniture and everything else in sight, but it’s actually based in reality. The Tang Dynasty period was full of peace, literature and poetry. Bordellos of the time were places of beauty and artistic expression, just like the one depicted in the film. This is aesthetically gotten across to the audience through the mise-en-scene of the Peony Pavilion. The aesthetics of the scene are also deceiving. Such as, during a long shot of Mei dancing we see blue butterflies on the floor. As she is wearing a similarly coloured  blue dress the audience may see the butterflies as a metaphor for Mei. This suggests delicateness and innocence. However, this is not the case. She’s actually a trained fighter and a member of the House of Flying Daggers. Plus, the central framing of Mei during the opening sequence aesthetically conveys her importance to the audience. Moreover, the use of repetition could aesthetically link to the representation of gender. Such as, the repetition of the men picking up their swords against the repetition of the women walking in with their instruments. This represents men as the fighters and women as the performers.

House of Flying Daggers Ending Notes

 

Cinematography 

 

  • Extreme long shot of Jin and Leo fighting with the contrast of the snow on the ground and the autumn coloured trees.
  • Mid shots of the fighting 
  • Close up of the swords intertwining 
  •  Mid shot of a drop of blood on the snow from Leo’s dagger 
  • Close up showing that Leo didn’t throw the dagger he wanted to kill her. Mei smiles, she keeps them both alive. 
  • Close up of Leo’s face when Mei is dying in Jin’s arms 
  • Close up of Leo dropping the dagger 
  • Extreme long shot of Leo walking away 
  • Extreme long shot of Jin holding Mei 
  • Camera tracks round as they elbow each other 
  • Sequence of crash zooms 
  • Close up of Mei crying 
  • Series of mid shots and close ups of the three individually and then an extreme close up 
  • Close up of eyes – reaction – crash zooms 
  • Extreme long shot – almost triangle like – Jin throws his sword and moves closer to Leo, trying to help. 
  • Circling camera
  • Close up/mid shot of Leo’s angry face then close up  of the blood he has drawn from Jin 
  • Camera tracks around them when they have stabbed each other in the back 

 

Mise en Scene 

 

  • Snowing (happened on set). The blood from Mei with the snow was foreshadowed at the beginning. 
  •  contrast of the snow on the ground and the autumn coloured trees. 
  • Army with their swords getting ready to attack the HOFD is the only thing we see of that attack. It’s about the romance story really. Plus, we probably know who will win anyway. The raid was set up as the point of the movie at the beginning, this is now cast aside. 
  • Blood flying across the scene 
  • Blood on the snow from the men (foreshadowed) 
  • Drop of blood on the snow 
  • Daggers hits the blood in the air – slow mo 
  • Blood pours from Mei 
  • Different from the bamboo fight scene. No wire work. Less special effects but still some. Bloodier and more brutal. 
  • White is a funeral colour for the Chinease 
  • Dagger sticking up might by symbolic of death – bad luck to leave chopsticks sticking up because they look like incense which get burned at funerals??
  • Notches on the sword – isn’t a ballet like scene that’s pretty it’s a fight to the death 
  • Repeated cutting each other’s shoulder and blood 
  • Jin cuts off Leo’s hat that represents his status 
  • In previous scenes they have used nature as a weapon, the snow is like nature fighting back against the injustice of the situation??

 

Sound 

 

  • Loud foley sword sounds but only when they clash 
  • Diegetic screaming 
  • High pitched singing – holding long notes and snowy landscape over the fight scene
  • Orchestral music when Mei gets up – we’ve heard it before – music about the love triangle/ tragic song of the film 
  • ‘You shouldn’t have come back’ repeated from earlier 
  • No music when Mei has hit the tree and before? Jin is running to Mei and holding her
  • He cries holding her
  • Jin sings Mei the song from the beginning to Mei while holding her as she dies 
  • ‘ I came back, for you, my love’ – romance genre 
  • Instrument playing over those ready to attack the HOFD is the same as the ones from the opening – history and politics – then it changes to the romance story 
  • Magical sound of the blade – sound of Leo’s (fake – tricks us) and Mei’s 

 

Performance 

  • They fight despite being injured. Originally they were set up to be on the same side. 
  • Mei starts to get up 
  • Mei hits the tree – romance not politics – not picking a side or an accident. It was going to hit the dagger as shown by the blood. Leo’s final deceit. 
  • Leo walks away (stumbling)
  • Different from the bamboo fight scene. No wire work. Less special effects but still some. 
  • Both Leo and Jin stab each other at the same time while facing back to back. They then remove the swords at the same time. They are equals. Betrayed each other. 
  • Leo removes his dagger 
  • Leo and Jin both being equally damaged in the same way etc 
  • Leo and Jin are different. Jin shows a softer side, he runs over to Mei and cries. Leo just leaves – he’s bitter, his undercover work has left the relationship with Mei stale, he’s hurt. Maybe it’s saying something about it not being what’s happened to you, but how you deal with it?
  • Close up showing that Leo didn’t throw the dagger he wanted to kill her. Mei smiles, she keeps them both alive. Leo deceives. Mei is selfless. 
  • Leo can’t look 
  • Left and right movement throughout the film. Leo turns right and leaves. Jin breaks this and goes to Mei.
  • Fighting feels less choreographed than earlier in the movie. Bloodier. Gritty. Harsh. Contrasts. 
  • Close up/mid shot of Leo’s angry face then close up  of the blood he has drawn from Jin 

 

Editing 

  • Slow motion of them punching/kicking sometimes??
  • Slow motion of the dagger 
  • Special effects of throwing the dagger and it hitting the blood in the air 
  • Editing compacts the different areas (bamboo forest and open space by tree of forest)
  • Fade from snow covered to snow storm 
  • Fade to black 
  • Break of continuity for effect – edit the same fight moment twice – crash into each other- emphasis 
  • Slow motion of edited blood when they slash one another 
  • Treats both men equally 
  • Conversation between Mei and Jin 

 

Meanings and Response 

 

  • Aesthetics 

 

Representation 

 

  • Women as strong and with their own feelings and motivations 

 

Context 

 

  • Political context 

House of Flying Daggers – Middle Notes

 

Cinematography:

  • close-up of the bamboo going through the bamboo and smashing on the bamboo – tension
  • long shot/extreme long shot of her being surrounded – link to other title
  • high key lighting
  • long shots to close ups of their faces when they are trapped
  • close up of them holding hands

 

Mise en Scene

  • shot on location in a bamboo forest
  • women – house of flying daggers – rescue them, standing together in a line – unstoppable (bar main three who are stood further forward)
  • flying daggers
  • bamboo cage
  • claustrophobic feel – then the HOFD show up with a lightness in the background

 

Performance

  • martial arts – Wuxia – wire work
  • mixture of special effects and wire work
  • Mei is acting blind still
  • Foreshadowing –  Jin throws the sword past Mei and hits the tree
  • Holding hands
  • The army/police fall down together x3
  • Mei’s fighting the urge to look at him – keeping up the facade

 

Editing

  • reduced cutting rate
  • slow-motion shots – flying people after being kicked, bamboo smashed against the bamboo, bamboo running together (with slow music when they are running together)

 

Sound

  • swords swooshing
  • clinging etc. – utilised to reinforce the idea that she’s blind when paired with the action-reaction shot of leaves falling, etc and the close up of her reaction
  • it’s from Mei’s perspective – heightened sound effects – she has to focus on sound (far away and close up has the same foregrounding)
  • no non-diegetic music (before Jin)
  • screaming
  • punctuation sound when Jin comes to save Mei
  • diegetic sound when Jin’s fighting
  • Whistling – throw bamboo call
  • when they’re trapped, the song she danced to plays
  • hear the dagger coming

 

Genre

  • Wuxia and wire work

 

Meanings/Messages/Response/Themes

  • politics and romance
  • deception

 

Representation

  • Jin/Mei/Leo represents the youth?
  • Mei is strong and powerful
  • House of Flying Daggers people/women contrast the women at the Peony Pavillion
  • How the film is reflective of Chinese culture, and how it is a Chinese film

 

Contexts

  • Oppressive, trapped, chased – regime?

 

ISP 9

 

I used this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfNKtxGMHig

 

  • Digital is cheaper in the end process but more expensive to buy in the first place
  • Film looks better in terms of colour etc
  • Film has a higher dynamic range, film is better at capturing details in whites and blacks and can’t be replicated with digital cameras. Also film can capture subtle details lost in digital photography
  • Digital cameras are generally lighter weight than film cameras.
  • Digital looks more high definition but this can make it appear unrealistic whereas film has the opposite effect
  • Several recent films have financially proven that movies shot on film still have a place in today’s society and film industry

 

Theories

Kim Longinotto
Longinotto has said ‘I don’t think of films as documents or records of things. I try to make them as like the experience of watching a fiction film
as possible, though, of course, nothing is ever set up.’ Her work is about finding characters that the audience will identify with – ‘you can make
this jump into someone else’s experience’. Unlike Moore and Broomfield, Longinotto is invisible, with very little use of voice-over, formal
interviews, captions or incidental music. As the ‘eyes’ of her audience, she doesn’t like to zoom or pan. She says she doesn’t want her films to
have conclusions but to raise questions.

Michael Moore
Moore, like Broomfield, is a very visible presence in his documentaries, which can thus be described as participatory and performative. His
work is highly committed – overtly polemical in taking up a clear point of view, what might be called agit-prop documentary. He justifies his
practice in terms of providing ‘balance’ for mainstream media that, in his view, provides false information. Part of Moore’s approach is to use
humour, sometimes to lampoon the subject of his work and sometimes to recognise that documentaries need to entertain and hold an
audience.

House of Flying Daggers – Opening Notes

 

 

Cinematography: 

  • Mid-shot/long-shot of her standing in-front of Jin, then after a reaction, a close-up of Mei
  • She’s framed in the centre, giving her more of a presence than the other girls
  • high key lighting, low contrast
  • Crane shot – tug of war
  • Zoomed in to wide – tracking shot of women entering. Also happens later with Mei
  • central framing

 

Mise en Scene:

  • text to set up the plot and the historical context
  • Green and red outfits
  • Peony Pavilion: colourful, stylised, elaborate
  • Colourful outfits (Peony Pavilion)
  • Blue dress – blue can be seen as a military colour BUT it’s more to do with feelings than a symbolic meaning
  • Specially made flooring
  • During the opening titles – red art on a white background – foreshadowing the ending with the blood on the snow
  • military/police base has dull colours/lack of colour especially when compared to the Peony Pavillion
  • Saturated colours
  • Bits of blue on the carpet – butterflies – and Mei’s dress is blue (high angle shot)
  • Red lipstick and paint separates her from the other women (and she said she was unlike them) and a possible link to the red associated with the soldiers/police

 

Editing:

  • Long take of her dancing (then it starts cutting – still her dancing)
  • Slow motion of her robe falling down after Jin cuts it
  • Cross fade of red lines to…….
  • Action reaction shots – conversation

 

Performance:

  • Mei is walking cautiously – deceiving us that she is blind
  • Jin is drunk
  • Leo is polishing his sword and sitting upright, contrasting to Jin who is slouched and drinking (but they are of equal rank)
  • Picking up swords compared to the women and instruments (similar/same shot) – representation of men and women
  • Repetition of men picking up the swords and the repetition of the women carrying the instruments.
  • Although everyone is lying – Leo true emotions are technically revealed as he feels jealous due to be in love with her
  • ‘Why can’t a blind girl work here?’ – Mei stands up for herself which Jin likes

 

Sound:

  • Opens with classical Chinese orchestra
  • Song lyrics that Mei sings
  • Distant sounds of laughter
  • Magical treatment to the sound one instrument echoes but not the rest – highly stylised sound scape
  • diegetic music
  • talking sets up the deception
  • “A second glance leaves the whole nation in ruins”

 

Messages/Meanings/Response:

  • Aesthetics: set (auteur), colour, elaborateness
  • Aesthetics: dedicates 3-4 minutes to a dance sequence

 

Representation – Gender:

  • women laughing as they lose tug of war against a single man (Jin)
  • He undresses Mei with his sword
  • Women all try and tear Jin away form hurting Mei
  • She’s arrested for being indecently dresses, but it’s not her fault – plan to arrest her then to ‘save’ her??
  • women are giggling, frivolous, named after flowers
  • women scared of the men
  • women falling over Jin

 

Contexts:

  • Tang Dynasty – Peony Pavilion  may seem over the top and stylised, but it has an element of truth. Correct representation.
  • Actress is in Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon