Category Archives: Beasts of the Southern Wild
Film Easter ISP
The Fallen Angels Question didn’t work for some reason, so here it is:
Section D: Film movements – Experimental film (1960-2000)
62) To what extent is the film you have studied recognisable as the product of an auteur? [20]
Fallen Angels is very recognisable as the product of the auteur Wong Kar-wai. For example, his recognisable use of film form. One of the main examples is his use of non-diegetic pop songs throughout the movie, not for ironic purposes, but to connote certain feelings to the audience. Another main example is his use of rain, which he uses to bring characters together in Fallen Angels, furthering the themes of loneliness and togetherness. The mise-en-scene of rain is also used in his other films like ‘The Grandmaster’. Furthermore, he has a specific use of editing in terms of time manipulation to convey meaning. Such as, the use of step printing, like during the assassination sequence, which to partially used to connote a sense of coolness to the character. He also uses slow motion, like the slow motion of the train dirivng past during the opening, which has a sense of lonliness. Simialrly, his use of cinematography also does this. His use of wide angle lens and deep depth of field shots create the sense of sepeartion, as the character at the front is distant from those behind them, creating the sense of lonliness and need for connection with other human beings. These themes can also be seen in his film ‘Chungking Express’, which is the sister film to Fallen Angels, which was initially the third part to the movie. Another connection between these movies are the actors. Interestingly, the same non-actor was used in both, which is an experminetal attitude to film making.
Narratively, Wong Kar-wai’s work tends to be experimental, which is part of his auteur signature. Such as, instead of the narrative focusing on plot and explantaion, it focuses on character, themes like lonliness and connection, and emtions, as he uses expermintal narrative devices and narrative structure to convey very real human emotion. Such as, the narrative device during the opening of narrative repeition of two characters following the same path through the station, then both picking up the same key (close up) and enetring the same house but at different times highlights their lonliness and lack of close connection. This is instead of narrative devices being used for expostion, which most films have during the opengn equilibrium, but Fallen Angels does not. Throughout, instead of explaining who the charcaters are, and why they do what they do, like why the man assisinates people, Wong Kar-wai doesn’t tell us, and instead focuses on the emotion. This could be why the ending equilibrium is open instead of a closed ending, as the two characters on the same bike, with her holding on to him, is suggesting a closness between the two, even if momentary, which in a way sums up the themes of the films and the emotions of the film rather than any plot. During this ending, the lighting in the tunnel is green, and green lighting was also iused earlier when the son was spying on his dad watching the footage he filmed. As Wong Kar-wai doesn’t foolow traditional colour theory, it can be hard to intepret the exact connotations and meaning of his colour choices, but they are picked intentionaly and for emotional meaning. It’s possible due to both times that green lighting was used that it represents closeness between the characters.
Beasts of the Southern Wild: Revision
Examine how either sound or editing is used in one sequence from your chosen film. [10]
The montage in the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ shows all of the best bits of the Bathtub to the audience. For example, we get to see the community aspect to the bathtub which aligns us with them. This is through the mise en scene and performance of the people of the bathtub parading down the street together, while positive folk music plays both diegetically and non-diegetically adding to the positive community feel; this is also an example of the audience being positioned with the bathtub. However, this is also an example of different responses, as while some audience members might be focused on the community aspect, others might view their actions of drinking around children irresponsible, especially since this alcohol effects their actions such as making babies race. The slow cut rate during the montage allows the spectator to develop views and opinions like these responses as they are given time to consider what they are seeing. Some viewers might be active viewers during this scene in the montage, as they may consider the benefits and downsides to the way the adults act around their children. Another part of the montage editing that can be interpreted as showing the good side to the bathtub is the part at the beginning when Hushpuppy is eating. During ‘feed up time’, she is at one with the animals as she eats with them and shares the food with them. This links to how the teacher woman said, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. This brings the binary oppositions of animal and humans together as equals, rather than opposing them. Another example of this is when we are positioned with Hushpuppy through subject positioning of the heart beat when she holds the bird to her ear and we hear it too, this performance shows that she is caring, which is a reason why we are aligned with her as an audience but also shows that she is caring towards animals.
Explore how far spectators respond both actively and passively to film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film. [20]
The exposition of the movie is likely to be watched by a passive viewer, as it’s normal for the opening of movies to give the spectator lots of information, like ideologies and the characters values, that the spectator just needs to take in as a way of setting up the film. For example, the opening montage allows the spectator to see how the people of the bathtub value animals as equals, as Hushpuppy eats with them and shares her food with them. This is reinforced with the teacher woman saying, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. However, as the montage continues, a spectator is likely to be driven to be active, as they might question the positive and negative sides of the way that the Bathtub act around children. For example, a spectator might respond by seeing the adults behaviour as irresponsible, as the performance of the drinking around children encourages imitation from the children, and the alcohol influences their decisions and makes them do things like race babies. A different response may be that they agree that this is irresponsible, but also see the freedom and community aspect of the Bathtub. The mise en scene of everyone together, and the positive, diegetic and non-diegetic folk music provides this sense of community.
During the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ there is a scene where Wink and Hushpuppy are looking at the Levee. During this scene, the spectators are passive viewers as they are directly told Wink’s values on the ideology of environmentalism. An example of this, is when he calls the factories and the buildings ‘ugly’. This is part of the binary opposition of the bathtub and the Levee, as the bathtub has a lower carbon footprint than the Levee which is a reason why we are aligned with them. This opposition is emphasised with the mise en scene, as the Levee is at a distance and unsaturated, contrasting to the Bathtub which is colourful, and literally walled off, adding to the opposition. This opposition makes the spectator an active viewer, as they are inclined to compare the two ways of living, and possibly compare it to their own life too. The positioning with Wink then changes back to Hushpuppy when she comes into focus. Her voice over also provides ideas of environmentalism that she believes in, such as her confusion about how the Levee put their fish in ‘plastic wrappers’. However, a spectator might be active and consider to what level these ideas are hers, and to what extent she has been influenced by her father. Despite this, we are aligned with the bathtub as we know that being an environmentalist is a good thing.
Towards the end of the movie, when Wink is dying, the editing and sound encourages an active viewer rather than a passive viewer. The action reaction shots of Wink dying, and Hushpuppy have a slow cutting rate which means the spectator has the time to decide what they feel, consider the characters values of ‘no crying’, and decide who they are positioned with in this scene. The sound also allows the spectator to be active, as the lack of music means that the viewer is not guided or told what to feel, they decide and feel it for themselves. The active viewing continues after Wink’s death, during the funeral. When Hushpuppy is setting Wink’s body on fire, an active spectator might consider whether they believe it was right for Hushpuppy to be the one to do this, or irresponsible. A viewer might believe that it was right for Hushpuppy to do this, as exposing children to the dark side of life is inevitable and in some cases it’s not fair to shelter them. Plus, an active viewers interpretation of the symbol of the aurochs might be that they symbolise her fears or maybe even innocence, and so the performance of Hushpuppy turning round and facing them, and the long shot of them bending down to her, showed an active viewer that Huhpuppy was strong, able to stand up to her fears, and more mature than a child who needs to be sheltered from everything. Therefore, an active viewer might believe that it was right for Huspuppy to be the fire starter, as she has shown that she is capable, and her just watching, would have been going back on the way that Hushpuppy is presented to us.
Explore how far spectators respond in the same way to a film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film. [20]
The opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ attracts different responses from spectators. At the very beginning, as it’s an exposition, most spectators are passive as the audience are told and shown directly characters ideologies and values. For example, how the people of the bathtub view themselves as equal to animals shown by the beyond close sonic perspective, subject positioning of the heart beat sound when Hushpuppy listens to the birds heart beat showing she cares for animals (making spectators aligned with her), and how during the ‘feed up time’ sequence in the montage, Hushpuppy eats with the animals and shares her food with them, this directly shows spectators that Hushpuppy values animals as equal to human, and the binary opposition of animal and human are brought together instead of opposed. As this is a passive sequence, most spectators would feel the same response, which is probably a respect for the way that Hushpuppy is caring for animals especially the bird because of her performance. However, as the montage sequence continues, spectators might start to respond in different ways. For example, according to Hall’s theory, the preferred response when the community are together drinking on the street is probably that the Bathtub is a positive place, where community is important, which is a response that some spectators would have. A reason why, is the performance of everyone being together emphasising the community feel, and the positive feel that the non-diegetic and diegetic folk music has on the scene. However, an oppositional reading and response (Hall), could be that the adults act irresponsibly, especially considering they are around children. They might believe that the performance of them drinking alcohol, encourages the children to do the same; children can be drinking, but most spectators assume it’s water. Plus, the drinking influences the adult’s actions, such as making them race babies, Therefore, a spectator’s response could instead be that the bathtub has irresponsible rules or lack thereof, rather than a good and free place. However, the most common response is probably the negotiated reading (Hall), where spectators combine these two attitudes about the bathtub.
The motif and symbol of the aurochs encourage a range of readings and responses from the audiences. Ad there true meaning is never explained explicitly, all active viewers would end up creating and attaching their own meaning to this symbol, therefore creating different responses between each individual. One response of the aurochs is that they symbolise Hushpuppy’s childhood and/or fears. This is because throughout the film, they keep appearing and re-appearing until the end when she stands up against them. The performance of her standing up against them, and the long shot of the aurochs kneeling down to her, shows that she has conquered the fears and/or difficulties that they represent, or maybe her childhood and innocence, as she says ‘I’ve got to take care of my own’, suggesting she is growing up. This line also adds to the theme of self-reliance, that the people of the bathtub have shown to have as a value throughout the movie. The response that the aurochs are a symbol for her childhood is reinforced with the music box non-diegetic music that plays one note at a time when Hushpuppy turns around and faces them, as the song has connotations of innocence and childhood. However, another response that active viewers might have of the aurochs is that they represent the environmental problems, which adds to the ideology and theme of environmentalism that is explored throughout. This is because the aurochs came from the melting ice, and so they could be a symbol for the environmental problems that the world, but especially the bathtub have to face as they have to deal with floods. Hushpuppy standing strong against them, shows that she is able to deal and cope with the environmental problems, despite being a child, as the representation of children in this film is that they are strong and don’t need to be sheltered. This is an example of being aligned with Hushpuppy, as she is shown as brave as well as varying which is shown earlier in the film, such as how she cares for animals.
Another scene that encourages different responses from spectators is the catfish sequence; as there are many possible responses to this sequence, the viewer is active, as it’s difficult for someone to passively take in information during this scene, as nothing is explicitly said to the spectator. A possible response is that the reason that the cat fish building seems so lovely and warm, such as the mise en scene and cinematography of the brightly coloured fairy lights, is because we see everything from Hushpuppy’s perspective, we are positioned with her, and she is looking for something good and pure which is reflected by what she see’s and therefore what we see. The low-level camera work reinforces this positioning with Hushpuppy, and how we see the world from her perspective. This is why the camera focuses on the performance of the hugs, because Hushpuppy is looking for motherly love and so that’s what the spectator see’s too. However, this might not be interpreted by all spectators. Instead, a viewer might be focusing on the women like Hushpuppy’s mother and creating responses to her specifically. The preferred response is probably how Hushpuppy is imagining this woman is her mother, and she is looking for a mother figure. However, an oppositional reading and response is that Hushpuppy imagined her mother being there, and that the woman she interacted with wasn’t even there at all. The cinematography of the bright light when they walk into the kitchen could suggest a dream, and all the references to the mother like the alligator and the beer and the repeated camera angle of her back could be to show the spectator that Hushpuppy is imaging her mother is there. The shot of the air, as stuff floats from the pan, could suggest that the woman isn’t actually there as she cannot be seen, just like earlier in the film when Hushpuppy pretends to be talking to her mother but instead when the camera turns to the chair, she cannot be seen. Plus, after the woman leaves, Hushpuppy is in the same position as she was before, these proxemics could suggest to some spectators that she never moved at all, and instead imagined the whole thing.
To what extent do ‘La La Land’ and ‘Beasts of the southern Wild’ share a similar treatment of film form elements?
- To what extent do ‘La La Land’ and ‘Beasts of the southern Wild’ share a similar treatment of film form elements?
One way that Beasts of the Southern Wild and La La Land share a similar treatment of film form elements is through the fact that they both utilise a film form technique as a motif. For example, in BOTSW, there is the motif of the mise en scene of the aurochs. For example, when we see them before the hospital sequence. This element of mise en scene requires an active spectator as the spectator has to question what they represent. One response is that they represent Hushpuppy’s childhood, while another would be that they represent the environmental problems therefore linking on to the ideology of environmentalism as they came from the melting ice. La La Land also uses a film form element as a motif, but instead it uses cinematography. La La Land uses the spotlight as a motif to represent its messages about art and other ideologies. For example, when Mia first hears Sebastian play in the restaurant, the spotlight singles him out emphasising how he is lost in his art, his passion and showing his passion through his performance. This contrasts to later on in the film during the Messenger’s sequence, originally Sebastian has the spotlight on him, but it soon disappears as the screen gets flooded with bright coloured lights. An active spectator could respond to this by considering how the lack of the spotlight is another way that the film is showing us that this isn’t where Sebastian should be, he has no passion for this. Another way that the film shows this is through Mia’s performance. After she hears the music, we get a mid-shot of her displaying her strong negative reaction to the music. One response to a passive spectator could be that she is disappointed. She’s aware that it isn’t Sebastian’s dream, and that his heart won’t be in it. This strong reaction goes against the feminist critiques that criticise the film by saying Mia is represented as the passive spectator, as she clearly isn’t passively watching. Mia also gets the spotlight during her audition, which not only contrasts to the montage of her previous auditions, but it again shows her passion for her art and how she’s lost in it.
Both films use film form elements to get across binary oppositions to the spectator. One example of this is the binary opposition of the Levee and the Bathtub in BOTSW. For example, we are often positioned with the Bathtub rather than the Levee, even when the shot is a extreme long shot of the Levee it is at a distant and lacking colour suggesting our separation from it, as well as contrasting to the colourful Bathtub which we are aligned with. This links in with the films exploration of environmentalism as Hushpuppy’s voice over calls the factories ‘ugly’ and the Levee’s lifestyle contrasts greatly to the environmentally friendly lifestyle of the Bathtub as shown through the opening montage meaning we as spectators are aligned with the Bathtub. We are also inclined to be aligned with the Bathtub and not the Levee when the people come and take them to the hospital. Their mise en scene of the clean shirts makes them seem like outsiders, and the foley helicopter sound makes it feel like an invasion. Interestingly, not only are we aligned with the Bathtub we’re also inclined to compare our lives to there’s mainly through the opening montage which shows their strong community of them all being together, but also the negatives such as the racing babies. A preferred response is probably the negotiated response which acknowledges the good and the bad. Film form is also used to get across a binary opposition in La La Land but in different ways. La La Land explores the binary opposition of traditionalism vs progress. This binary opposition links into the themes of compromise and conflict, there is conflict and compromise between traditionalism and progress. Mia represents progress, when we first see her, she is learning new lines and she’s always willing to get influenced by new things like her newfound love of Jazz. Sebastian represents the past, when we first see him, he is seen rewinding his tapes of his old music; he’s stuck in the past. An active spectator could argue that this is a reason why they didn’t end up together, if they represent these two things, they can’t both exist fully together, there will always be conflict and compromise and one of them will have to exist over the other. This is shown through the film form in the fantasy sequence at the end of the film, with all the references to old and newer movies like when Mia gets handed the red balloon it’s almost as if it’s saying how nice it would be if we could have both traditionalism and progress and not have to pick, but in reality it’s not possible and so they separate. This scene can also be seen from the perspective of the romance genre which the film form also gets across, the fantasy sequence was a ridiculously happy Hollywood ending that couldn’t actually happen, only in movies, which they literally sit down and watch. In reality, it ends on a smile.
Both films use non-diegetic and diegetic sound to get across meaning. For example, in BOTSW, the ending uses music to convey messages. Before Hushpuppy turns around to face the aurochs there is powerful and building up non-diegetic music and when she turns around it transitions into the non-diegetic music box music which is representative of her childhood. This paired with the dialogue of ‘I gotta take care of mine’ could be interpreted as an active spectator of being representative of Hushpuppy saying goodbye to her childhood, as well as her standing up to her fears as the aurochs can be interpreted as a metaphor for her fears and troubles. This scene brings the coming of age element of the film to a close as it’s a signal that she’s grown up now, she’s ready to face her fears and take care of people. La La Land also uses sound to convey meaning such as during the dinner scene. The diegetic music of the upbeat version of ‘City of Stars’ has connotations of romance and happiness, which contrasts to their eventual raised voices and arguing. When the music suddenly ends leaving uncomfortable silence, a passive or active spectator could feel this is representative of the end of their relationship. The diegetic fire alarm also suggests this, as it suggests their relationship is no longer nice. This is supported by the use of colour, the yellow from the candle lights starts as nice and intimate but it’s meaning changes to frustration as the scene plays out. BOTSW also uses lighting, such as the fairy lights during the flashback sequence which allows the spectators to see the place from a child’s perspective which is why the ‘floating catfish shack’ appears loving and sweet.
Both films use film form elements to get across the theme of independence. For example in the BOTSW ending there’s the diegetic dialogue of ‘I gotta take care of mine’ said by Hushpuppy which suggests that she is independent and will help to look after her friends and family. The opening also suggests her independence through mise en scene as she lives in a separate house to her father. Some spectators might have a surprised response to this as she is only young yet living alone. The films theme of independence links into its theme and exploration of self-reliance. For example, when Hushpuppy’s father rejects the treatment he is offered at the hospital. La La Land also uses film form to get across the themes of independence. During the opening the song lyrics to ‘Another Day of Sun’ express how these people have left their lives behind to try and achieve their dreams; this is representative of Mia which is one reason why she is the protagonist. This song may sound happy, but it’s lyrics suggest a hard side to making it in Hollywood which is supported by the mise en scene of the traffic jam; this is the films representation of LA. The lyrics link into the theme of independence, which is further supported by Mia going against what she is told by her friends (to look for someone in the crowd to help) and instead she writes a one woman show. The theme of independence links into the theme of individuality which is also shown in the opening. The range of peoples different diegetic music taste, as well as their different performance in terms of their dancing shows their individuality which a spectator would hope would allow them to make it as they are individual. But again, the scene suggests otherwise, it may seem dreamlike with the apparent one shot but it may be just a dream for these people, as shown by the cuts being hidden in whip pans suggesting the harsher side to LA meaning these peoples independence and individuality might not be enough.
Positioning and Alignment Essay (Beasts of the Southern Wild)
Account for the difference in positioning and alignment in the film you have studied. [20]
An example of the difference between positioning and alignment in ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ is when the spectator is aligned with Hushpuppy at the hospital, but positioned with Wink. The mid shot of Wink being told his medical problems is an example of being positioned with Wink, and the spectator can just about hear the diegetic dialogue of Wink being told he could die. Wink rejects the help of the hospital, adding to the theme of self reliance. In this moment, one response is to be aligned with Hushpuppy which could be considered to be the preferred reading and response. This alignment would come from feelings of empathy and sympathy for Hushpuppy, as she knows that her father will die and is seriously ill. The performance of Hushpuppy during the mid shot to close up after this moment shows the spectators that Hushpuppy is processing this serious information, and that she understands its seriousness as her facial expression is serious. However, a different response to this moment could be that during the entire scene we were both positioned and aligned with Hushpuppy, as the shot of her father could be interpreted as a point of view shot from her perspective meaning we are positioned with her as an audience. This is supported by how low camera angles are used throughout the film to emphasise how the narrative and film is seen and explored through her perspective. There is also a negotiated response to the alignment during this scene, as a viewer may believe we are aligned with both Hushpuppy and Wink, rather than just one of them. The changes in positions and alignment while involving these two characters is common in this movie. Sometimes it takes the for, of the difference between positioning and alignment with one character, then in the next shot with the other. An example of these different positioning’s and alignments is during the ending of the movie, when Wink is dying. We as spectators are mainly positioned with and aligned with Hushpuppy. Such as, the beyond close sonic perspective, subject positioning of the heart beat sound when Hushpuppy puts her ear to Wink’s chest. This emphasises our positioning with Hushpuppy, as well as our alignment as we feel sympathy for her being in that situation. However, we are also positioned and aligned with Wink during this scene which is different to what’s normal in the film. For example, the close ups of his face position us with him, and his performance of his emotional facial expressions align spectators with him, as an active viewer may consider some of the thoughts going through Wink’s mind, such as how he is about to die, and what will happen to his daughter.
Another example of the difference between positioning and alignment in ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ is during the sequence where the social workers from the Levee come and force people from the Bathtub to go to hospital. In this scene, a spectator may feel that they are positioned with the social workers, but aligned with the Bathtub. For example, the over the shoulder shot when a social worker is forcing a woman to move could be interpreted as being positioned with the social workers, as we see from what is almost their perspective. Their performance of physically grabbing the woman and the over the shoulder shot makes the social workers seem like invaders, and this allows the spectators to be aligned with the Bathtub and to fear the social workers, despite being positioned with the social workers. This scene also adds to the binary opposition of the Levee and the Bathtub. The threat that social workers impose upon the Bathtub helps to create this opposition, through cinematography and performance that encourages spectators to feel a certain way. A spectator feeling as though the social workers were like invaders was probably the preferred reading and response to this part of the movie, and maybe the movie as a whole. However, an oppositional reading could be that the social workers were in the right, and were not like invaders. For example, the mise en scene of their clean clothes might suggest to them a sense of professionalism which could have connotations of trust. However, this is unlikely.
Beasts of the Southern Wild – Ending
Positioning vs Alignment
- Subjective positioning- heart beat sound and when it stops we know that Hushpuppy knows what it means
- Positioned with Hushpuppy and/or Wink when Wink is floating away
- Aligned with Hushpuppy when Wink is dying/is dead
- Positioned with Wink when he is dying as well
- Positioned briefly with the aurochs (?)
- Positioned with the rest of the Bathtub briefly
- Over the shoulder shot when walking – positioned with Hushpuppy
Film Form/Dynamic Interaction With Spectator
- performance – Hushpuppy shown as/acts strong
- Extreme close up of the aurochs eye
- Performance of crying and ‘no crying’ dialogue
- Motif of the aurochs
- Performance – fierce/strong facial expression (Hushpuppy)
- Sound – music drifts off/stops/briefly you hear the music box music when Hushpuppy turns to face the aurochs
- ‘I gotta take care of mine’ – Hushpuppy
- Manifestation of her fear – aurochs (a possible interpretation)
- Aurochs don’t look like aurochs because we see them from Hushpuppy’s perspective
- We can hear the aurochs (Hushpuppy’s perspective)
- Action reaction shot of trying not to cry
- Mise en scene – Wink wrapped up
- ending shot – defiant, camera moving back making them smaller, sea level rising, reverse tracking shot with piano and string music
Binary Oppositions
- Levee and Bathtub – marching into the Levee(?), funeral
- Hospital treatment and refusal of treatment – self reliance
- Life and Death – Hushpuppy is the one who sets the fire which shows that she doesn’t need to be protected even as a child, that she is leader like and that she is respected. Plus, the voice over tells us that Hushpuppy has already decided what her legacy will be
- Young and old
Passive and Active Viewing
- Active – understanding the meaning behind the aurochs
- Active/Passive – thinking about the representation of children
Range of Readings/Responses (Hall)
- Multiple interpretations of the aurochs – childhood, innocence, environmental meaning, fears, strength. She stands up to whatever they represent, climax, real and fantasy come together (e.g. rising sea levels)
- Aurochs – An imaginative world is being left behind, she has to look after herself and her dying dad
- Who we are positioned with when Wink is dying
Ideology/Values
- emotional strength/control – no crying
- Self Reliance – not getting treatment from the hospital
- Environmentalism- aurochs (melting ice)
- ‘when it all goes quiet behind my eyes’ speech – reflective, recognises that she is part of the world. ‘When I look too hard it goes away’. ‘I see that I’m a little piece of a big, big universe and that makes things right’.
- ‘When I die, the scientists of the future are gonna find it all’ – panning shot of elders, identifies herself with that community and she understand her own mortality.
Beasts of the Southern Wild – Flashback
Positioning vs Alignment
- positioned with the other children as well as Hushpuppy, and others in the building
- Positioned with the woman (mother-like figure)
- Aligned with Hushpuppy
- Aligned with the woman when she is holding Hushpuppy as well as being aligned with Hushpuppy
Film Form/Dynamic Interaction
- ‘floating catfish shack’, ‘girls girls girls’, ‘Elysian fields’ (- fairy tale) lights
- children looking down into the light
- can’t hear the people on the stage talking, hear muffled background voices and music
- bright light – walking into the kitchen
- close up of the food contrasting to the close up of the bugs at the beginning
- Point of view shot when being held by her dad
- Fairy lights – magical realism – real but appears magical
- real lights/lighting (?) – passion (?)
- The mother figures speech is similar to the woman’s from beginning as it’s about how you have to look after yourself – theme of self reliance
- hand held camera
- out of focus – dreamy, ideal
- repetition shot of the same memory of the mum cooking
Binary Oppositions
- men and women and their interaction with children
Range of Readings/Responses (Hal) (and active viewing)
- Woman fulfilling maternal actions contrasts with the coldness of the blue lighting when the dad holds her and contrasts with the fairy lights with the women
- All the children could be looking for a mother-like attention
- Hushpuppy’s imagining that it’s her mum (active viewing)
- Maybe the woman isn’t even there? (active viewing)
Ideology/Values
- Physical contact – comfort
- She was looking for a mother hence we see it as a warm environment as it’s from the child’s perspective
Beasts of the Southern Wild ISP Questions
Examine how either sound or editing is used in one sequence from your chosen film. [10]
The montage in the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ shows all of the best bits of the Bathtub to the audience. For example, we get to see the community aspect to the bathtub which aligns us with them. This is through the mise en scene and performance of the people of the bathtub parading down the street together, while positive folk music plays both diegetically and non-diegetically adding to the positive community feel; this is also an example of the audience being positioned with the bathtub. However, this is also an example of different responses, as while some audience members might be focused on the community aspect, others might view their actions of drinking around children irresponsible, especially since this alcohol effects their actions such as making babies race. The slow cut rate during the montage allows the spectator to develop views and opinions like these responses as they are given time to consider what they are seeing. Some viewers might be active viewers during this scene in the montage, as they may consider the benefits and downsides to the way the adults act around their children. Another part of the montage editing that can be interpreted as showing the good side to the bathtub is the part at the beginning when Hushpuppy is eating. During ‘feed up time’, she is at one with the animals as she eats with them and shares the food with them. This links to how the teacher woman said, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. This brings the binary oppositions of animal and humans together as equals, rather than opposing them. Another example of this is when we are positioned with Hushpuppy through subject positioning of the heart beat when she holds the bird to her ear and we hear it too, this performance shows that she is caring, which is a reason why we are aligned with her as an audience but also shows that she is caring towards animals.
Explore how far spectators respond both actively and passively to film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film. [20]
The exposition of the movie is likely to be watched by a passive viewer, as it’s normal for the opening of movies to give the spectator lots of information, like ideologies and the characters values, that the spectator just needs to take in as a way of setting up the film. For example, the opening montage allows the spectator to see how the people of the bathtub value animals as equals, as Hushpuppy eats with them and shares her food with them. This is reinforced with the teacher woman saying, ‘we are all part of the buffet of the universe’. However, as the montage continues, a spectator is likely to be driven to be active, as they might question the positive and negative sides of the way that the Bathtub act around children. For example, a spectator might respond by seeing the adults behaviour as irresponsible, as the performance of the drinking around children encourages imitation from the children, and the alcohol influences their decisions and makes them do things like race babies. A different response may be that they agree that this is irresponsible, but also see the freedom and community aspect of the Bathtub. The mise en scene of everyone together, and the positive, diegetic and non-diegetic folk music provides this sense of community.
During the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ there is a scene where Wink and Hushpuppy are looking at the Levee. During this scene, the spectators are passive viewers as they are directly told Wink’s values on the ideology of environmentalism. An example of this, is when he calls the factories and the buildings ‘ugly’. This is part of the binary opposition of the bathtub and the Levee, as the bathtub has a lower carbon footprint than the Levee which is a reason why we are aligned with them. This opposition is emphasised with the mise en scene, as the Levee is at a distance and unsaturated, contrasting to the Bathtub which is colourful, and literally walled off, adding to the opposition. This opposition makes the spectator an active viewer, as they are inclined to compare the two ways of living, and possibly compare it to their own life too. The positioning with Wink then changes back to Hushpuppy when she comes into focus. Her voice over also provides ideas of environmentalism that she believes in, such as her confusion about how the Levee put their fish in ‘plastic wrappers’. However, a spectator might be active and consider to what level these ideas are hers, and to what extent she has been influenced by her father. Despite this, we are aligned with the bathtub as we know that being an environmentalist is a good thing.
Towards the end of the movie, when Wink is dying, the editing and sound encourages an active viewer rather than a passive viewer. The action reaction shots of Wink dying, and Hushpuppy have a slow cutting rate which means the spectator has the time to decide what they feel, consider the characters values of ‘no crying’, and decide who they are positioned with in this scene. The sound also allows the spectator to be active, as the lack of music means that the viewer is not guided or told what to feel, they decide and feel it for themselves. The active viewing continues after Wink’s death, during the funeral. When Hushpuppy is setting Wink’s body on fire, an active spectator might consider whether they believe it was right for Hushpuppy to be the one to do this, or irresponsible. A viewer might believe that it was right for Hushpuppy to do this, as exposing children to the dark side of life is inevitable and in some cases it’s not fair to shelter them. Plus, an active viewers interpretation of the symbol of the aurochs might be that they symbolise her fears or maybe even innocence, and so the performance of Hushpuppy turning round and facing them, and the long shot of them bending down to her, showed an active viewer that Huhpuppy was strong, able to stand up to her fears, and more mature than a child who needs to be sheltered from everything. Therefore, an active viewer might believe that it was right for Huspuppy to be the fire starter, as she has shown that she is capable, and her just watching, would have been going back on the way that Hushpuppy is presented to us.
Explore how far spectators respond in the same way to a film. Illustrate your answer by close reference to your chosen film. [20]
The opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ attracts different responses from spectators. At the very beginning, as it’s an exposition, most spectators are passive as the audience are told and shown directly characters ideologies and values. For example, how the people of the bathtub view themselves as equal to animals shown by the beyond close sonic perspective, subject positioning of the heart beat sound when Hushpuppy listens to the birds heart beat showing she cares for animals (making spectators aligned with her), and how during the ‘feed up time’ sequence in the montage, Hushpuppy eats with the animals and shares her food with them, this directly shows spectators that Hushpuppy values animals as equal to human, and the binary opposition of animal and human are brought together instead of opposed. As this is a passive sequence, most spectators would feel the same response, which is probably a respect for the way that Hushpuppy is caring for animals especially the bird because of her performance. However, as the montage sequence continues, spectators might start to respond in different ways. For example, according to Hall’s theory, the preferred response when the community are together drinking on the street is probably that the Bathtub is a positive place, where community is important, which is a response that some spectators would have. A reason why, is the performance of everyone being together emphasising the community feel, and the positive feel that the non-diegetic and diegetic folk music has on the scene. However, an oppositional reading and response (Hall), could be that the adults act irresponsibly, especially considering they are around children. They might believe that the performance of them drinking alcohol, encourages the children to do the same; children can be drinking, but most spectators assume it’s water. Plus, the drinking influences the adult’s actions, such as making them race babies, Therefore, a spectator’s response could instead be that the bathtub has irresponsible rules or lack thereof, rather than a good and free place. However, the most common response is probably the negotiated reading (Hall), where spectators combine these two attitudes about the bathtub.
The motif and symbol of the aurochs encourage a range of readings and responses from the audiences. Ad there true meaning is never explained explicitly, all active viewers would end up creating and attaching their own meaning to this symbol, therefore creating different responses between each individual. One response of the aurochs is that they symbolise Hushpuppy’s childhood and/or fears. This is because throughout the film, they keep appearing and re-appearing until the end when she stands up against them. The performance of her standing up against them, and the long shot of the aurochs kneeling down to her, shows that she has conquered the fears and/or difficulties that they represent, or maybe her childhood and innocence, as she says ‘I’ve got to take care of my own’, suggesting she is growing up. This line also adds to the theme of self-reliance, that the people of the bathtub have shown to have as a value throughout the movie. The response that the aurochs are a symbol for her childhood is reinforced with the music box non-diegetic music that plays one note at a time when Hushpuppy turns around and faces them, as the song has connotations of innocence and childhood. However, another response that active viewers might have of the aurochs is that they represent the environmental problems, which adds to the ideology and theme of environmentalism that is explored throughout. This is because the aurochs came from the melting ice, and so they could be a symbol for the environmental problems that the world, but especially the bathtub have to face as they have to deal with floods. Hushpuppy standing strong against them, shows that she is able to deal and cope with the environmental problems, despite being a child, as the representation of children in this film is that they are strong and don’t need to be sheltered. This is an example of being aligned with Hushpuppy, as she is shown as brave as well as varying which is shown earlier in the film, such as how she cares for animals.
Another scene that encourages different responses from spectators is the catfish sequence; as there are many possible responses to this sequence, the viewer is active, as it’s difficult for someone to passively take in information during this scene, as nothing is explicitly said to the spectator. A possible response is that the reason that the cat fish building seems so lovely and warm, such as the mise en scene and cinematography of the brightly coloured fairy lights, is because we see everything from Hushpuppy’s perspective, we are positioned with her, and she is looking for something good and pure which is reflected by what she see’s and therefore what we see. The low-level camera work reinforces this positioning with Hushpuppy, and how we see the world from her perspective. This is why the camera focuses on the performance of the hugs, because Hushpuppy is looking for motherly love and so that’s what the spectator see’s too. However, this might not be interpreted by all spectators. Instead, a viewer might be focusing on the women like Hushpuppy’s mother and creating responses to her specifically. The preferred response is probably how Hushpuppy is imagining this woman is her mother, and she is looking for a mother figure. However, an oppositional reading and response is that Hushpuppy imagined her mother being there, and that the woman she interacted with wasn’t even there at all. The cinematography of the bright light when they walk into the kitchen could suggest a dream, and all the references to the mother like the alligator and the beer and the repeated camera angle of her back could be to show the spectator that Hushpuppy is imaging her mother is there. The shot of the air, as stuff floats from the pan, could suggest that the woman isn’t actually there as she cannot be seen, just like earlier in the film when Hushpuppy pretends to be talking to her mother but instead when the camera turns to the chair, she cannot be seen. Plus, after the woman leaves, Hushpuppy is in the same position as she was before, these proxemics could suggest to some spectators that she never moved at all, and instead imagined the whole thing.
Beasts of the Southern Wild – Aurochs and Hospital
Positioning vs Alignment
- Position switches between Wink and Hushpuppy
- Aligned with the Bathtub when they physically face them – like they are being invaded
- Aligned and positioned with Hushpuppy when her dad is fighting
Film Form/Dynamic Interaction with Spectator
- voice over narration (doesn’t necessarily passivy the viewer)
- auroch – symbolic of themes (e.g. growing up, fear, environmentalism – magical realism)
- aurochs – cannibalistic, pigs because she hasn’t seen what they really look like
- aurochs – high contrast lighting
- can’t tell the difference between the aurochs
- low camera angle – aurochs
- aurochs – slow music and close sonic perspective of snorting etc
- sound of helicopter – invading
- point of view shot
- people look like outsiders – clean shirt
- Over the shoulder shot when taking the woman in a forceful way
- movement cutting through frame
- hand held camera
- can’t see Hushpuppy briefly
- first proper building that we have seen – looks secure and safer but it has no windows, and looks intimidating, soulless and lacking in character, not very opening
- high key lighting
- whiteness and lack of colour
- ‘it didn’t look like a prison’ – being taken from home is the equivalent to prison maybe
- ‘fish tank without any water’ – see the world from a child’s perspective
- Voice over is in past tense like she is retelling the story – possibly as an older woman looking back
- plastic tray and artificially shaped food
- regimentation
- low angle up at doctor (results) – her point of view
- not in-front of my kid – wants what is best for her, he does have responsibility etc (contrasting to previous scenes)
- sound is echoing – just about hear ‘you could die’
- rejects what is possibly treatment (theme of self-reliance, goes against his principles)
- music box music comes back
- Hushpuppy in a blue dress out f character (ideologically and stereotyping what a girl should wear/social construct) seems unnatural and she looks uncomfortable
- Hushpuppy looks uncomfortable and separate – she’s still while everyone else moves – unfamiliar to her
- plastic toys (contrasting to the beginning of the film)
- out of focus image of her dad, then focuses. Not like his character. (plastic on his nose)
Binary Oppositions
- Bathtub and Levee – regimentation, plastic trays (vs feed up time from earlier), artificially shaped food
Passive/Active Viewing
- Active – aurochs
- Passive – being taken to the hospital
Range of Readings/Responses (Hall)
- different interpretations of the aurochs e.g. environmental side
Ideology/Values
- environmentalism
- self-reliance
How does film language align the spectator with specific characters in the film you have studied? – BOTSW
During the opening of ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’, we are aligned and positioned with Hushpuppy. For example, through subjective positioning we hear things from her perspective like the bird’s heartbeat when she holds it to her ear. This performance of her listening to the bird’s heartbeat shows that she is caring, meaning the audience is now aligned with her. The low-level camera work throughout the film reinforces our positioning with Hushpuppy as we are physically at her level which links to how we see the world from her perspective. Such as, when Hushpuppy is in the ‘floating catfish shack’, the audience would assume this to be a brothel but from Hushpuppy’s perspective and due to being positioned with Hushpuppy, the place looks magical and lovely such as with the mise en scene of the colourful fairy lights.
Throughout the film we are usually positioned and aligned with the people of the bathtub, especially Hushpuppy and Wink. We are aligned and normally positioned with the bathtub instead of the Levee, which is represented negatively through the characters we are aligned/positioned with; this links to the Bathtub and the Levee being a binary opposition. For example, when Wink and Hushpuppy are on the boat, the mise en scene of the Levee is desaturated, grey, dim and at a distance which contrasts greatly to the bathtub which is colourful and has people like Hushpuppy that we are aligned with. This creates the idea that we are not positioned with the Levee or the people that live there, as it’s literally at a distance and walled off. We are also not aligned with the Levee or the people that live there. This is reinforced when Wink discusses how the Levee do not act in an environmentally friendly way, contrasting to the bathtub which has a low carbon footprint. This links to the ideology of environmentalism, which the bathtub all believes in and live by which is a reason why we are aligned with them as an audience. An example of Wink discussing the non-environmentally friendly side of the Levee is when he calls their buildings and polluting factories ‘ugly’. The perspective then changes as Hushpuppy comes into focus, her voice over then supports the idea of environmentalism too and criticises the Levee for having fish in ‘plastic’. An active audience member might consider whether the things that Hushpuppy is thinking are her own true opinions or if she’s just copying and learning from her father Wink. However, throughout the film the representation of children us that they are strong, and don’t have to be treated completely differently to adults. Meaning, her voice over on environmentalism is probably what she truly believes. An example of child being represented as strong is through the mise en scene and performance of Hushpuppy during the ending when she turns around and faces the aurochs which an active viewer might interpret as a symbol for her childhood and/or fears. Her standing up against them with a brave face and making them kneel down, shows how she is strong as a child and can handle her fears. The music stopping when she faces them, and then the music box sound playing briefly empathises the impact of this moment and how she is a capable and strong child. However, the symbol of the aurochs gathers a range of readings and responses (Hall). For example, one audience member may see them as a symbol for her childhood and fears, but another may view them as a symbol of the environmental problems as they came from the ice, again adding to the ideology of environmentalism which is explored throughout the film. That means that this scene could be suggesting that despite being a child, Hushpuppy is able to cope and stand up to the very real effect that environmental problems have on the Bathtub like the floods.
Just before the hospital sequence, we are again positioned and aligned with the people that live in the Bathtub as the outsiders who come and take them are presented negatively. For example, the over the shoulder shot of the woman forcefully being taken by them adds to the idea that these people are invading them. This invading feel started with the mise en scene and the sound, as the helicopter sound gave the invading feel to the scene and the mise en scene of their clean and formal shirts makes them seem like outsides. There is even a brief time when we are not positioned with Hushpuppy and cannot see her at all despite being positioned with her dad which builds the tension in the spectator as we are worried for her. When we see the hospital, it appears soulless and has no windows, contrasting to the bathtub which was colourful and open to nature, which is again adding to the binary opposition of the Levee and the Bathtub as well as making the hospital seem like a negative place. Once in the hospital we are again positioned with Hushpuppy. Such as, when her father is being told about his medical problems, we see her dad fighting with a point of view shot from her perspective. This reinforces our alignment with Hushpuppy as spectators as we feel sympathy for her. During this scene, her father is arguing that he doesn’t want the hospitals medical help, this adds to the theme of self-reliance which is reinforced throughout the film. Such as, the performance of the mother like figure during the flashback sequence, as she tells Hushpuppy how she has to look after herself. This sequence of the mother figure can be interpreted in different ways (Hall). For example, one way is that Hushpuppy was looking for a mother figure, which is why the catfish shack appears so warm with the fairy lights because she was looking for and sort of found a mother figure which is nice. However, another interpretation is that the woman was just a figment of Hushpuppy’s imagination. This is because, when she walks into the kitchen the cinematography of the bright light that they walk into suggest a dream like sequence is coming. Then, the performance and mise en scene all link this woman back to her mother, suggesting that Hushpuppy is imaging that she is with her mother. For example, the performance of her drinking beer like earlier, and the way she blows on the egg to crack it seems like the fantasy element earlier of her walking past the oven and turning it on. Plus, she is cooking what appears like crocodile/alligator, which is what she killed in the flashback. As well as this, the cinematography supports this interpretation with the camera. Such as, there is a shot of the mum that is repeated from earlier in the film, as well as a shot of the room, with bits from the pan floating up which could be interpreted to show that the woman wasn’t actually there, as instead of standing by the pan, she cannot be seen. Plus, after Hushpuppy hugs the woman, she is in a similar position to when she first saw her, maybe suggesting she never moved and just imagined it. This response is an example of active viewing, but is not the only example of active viewing such as the interpretation that she was looking for a mother figure which is why the brothel appears so lovely, because we are seeing it from a child’s perspective and a child who is looking for something lovely which is reflected in what she sees like the fairy lights and the hugs.